On March 9, 2026, the HACC Appeals Chamber continued hearing the appeal in the case against former SFS head Roman Nasirov concerning his alleged involvement in Onyshchenko’s “gas scheme.”

Two defense lawyers were absent from the hearing, and the defense objected to continuing the proceedings. However, the court decided to proceed in their absence, noting that the alleged criminal offenses are not classified as especially grave. As a result, Nasirov’s defense had to begin its closing arguments. Three of the defendant’s other lawyers spoke today.

One of Nasirov’s attorneys emphasized that there were no severe consequences, arguing that a deferral merely changes deadlines rather than causing harm. She also called the first-instance verdict an “imitation,” claiming the decision had been predetermined and that the judges’ brief time in the deliberation room only confirmed a formalistic approach.

Another defense lawyer pointed to what she described as systemic procedural violations and argued that the first-instance court should have recused itself. A third defense lawyer supported these arguments and insisted that Nasirov’s actions did not constitute a criminal offense.

Overall, the defense asked the court to overturn the verdict, close the criminal proceedings against Nasirov, and release him from custody. 

At the next hearing, Nasirov’s third defense lawyer will continue with closing arguments. In addition, two more defense lawyers and Nasirov himself are expected to speak.

As we reported earlier, Nasirov was sentenced to 6 years’ imprisonment in the so-called Onyshchenko gas case. He was charged with unlawfully granting deferrals of tax debt and subsoil use rent to companies linked to Onyshchenko.