Search

The case of the former head of the SFS (State Fiscal Service) Roman Nasirov: Onyshchenko's “gas scheme”

  • Date of commencement of the case: 25/10/2019
  • Instance: HACC
  • Stage of criminal proceedings: Preparatory proceedings
Track case progress If you would like to follow the case, leave your email and get updates sent straight to your inbox
The case of the former head of the SFS (State Fiscal Service) Roman Nasirov: Onyshchenko's “gas scheme” The case of the former head of the SFS (State Fiscal Service) Roman Nasirov: Onyshchenko's “gas scheme”

Case description

Roman Nasirov, former head of the State Fiscal Service, is accused of involvement in Onyshchenko's gas case, in which he and an accomplice, according to the prosecution, issued an illegal order to pay monetary obligations in installments for the use of mineral resources for mining and evaded paying tax debt in installments. The state is likely to have suffered losses of about UAH 2 billion.

The case of former MP Oleksandr Onyshchenko began to be investigated back in 2015. According to the NABU, Onyshchenko organized a scheme to sell gas from the state enterprise Ukrgasvydobuvannya to controlled companies on fake exchanges at reduced prices. The latter sold gas to consumers at market prices, while operating on the price difference scheme — thus, the organizers made money and the state suffered losses.

According to the anti-corruption authorities, Nasirov's role in this scheme was to give his subordinates from the SFS authorities an illegal order to defer tax debts of Firm Khas LLC, Nadra Heotsentr LLC, and Karpatnadrainvest LLC, all three controlled by Onyshchenko.

According to the investigation, the heads of the Main Departments of the State Fiscal Service in Kharkiv, Poltava, and Dnipropetrovsk regions, under Roman Nasirov's guidance, submitted false information about the alleged threat of bankruptcy of companies. In fact, there were no real risks: the companies consistently bought gas from the state at cost price, while the tax debt continued to grow. The financial statements deliberately omitted the installments already received and the terms of payment for tax obligations, which was contrary to the law.

The pre-trial investigation bodies indicate that, under Nasirov's instructions, employees of the territorial departments of the State Fiscal Service issued positive conclusions about the possibility of deferred payments, despite there being no grounds for this. In December 2015, Nasirov altered the terms of previously granted deferrals, postponing the payment of debts to January 1, 2016, which also violated the law. Two forensic economic examinations confirmed that Nasirov's actions from May 2015 to March 2016 could have resulted in a shortfall of more than UAH 2 billion in state income.

Roman Nasirov

Roman Nasirov

Picture

The defense claims that Nasirov acted within the limits of his powers, and that the decision on deferred payments was made by the relevant divisions of the State Fiscal Service. In addition, the defense emphasizes that deferred payment did not mean an exemption from paying taxes, and that there were no criminal proceedings or official investigations into tax evasion against the enterprises.

The case also involves Volodymyr Novikov, the former head of a department of the State Fiscal Service. He was allegedly Nasirov's accomplice in the abuses. Also, the former head of the Department, Liudmyla Solotva, was likely involved in the scheme (there are separate proceedings against her, and the trial is ongoing).

Before the HACC started its operation, Nasirov's case was heard by the Shevchenkivskyi District Court of Kyiv. In October 2019, it was referred to the HACC, where its trial is still ongoing.

Nasirov was charged with Article 364, Part 2 and Article 366, Part 1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. In September 2023, he was exempted from liability for forgery, as the statute of limitations under the article had already expired.

Volodymyr Novikov, Nasirov's accomplice, was charged under Article 27, Part 5 and Article 364, Part 2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. There is no final decision in the case yet.

In 2017, Nasirov was removed from office, and in early 2018, the Cabinet of Ministers dismissed the head of the SFS. Later, the infamous Kyiv District Administrative Court reinstated Nasirov to his position. Nasirov, however, waived the claims.

That same year, it became known from the SAPO prosecutor that Nasirov held British and Hungarian citizenships. His British citizenship was also confirmed by the then-Ambassador of Ukraine to the United Kingdom. Furthermore, in the spring of 2021, Nasirov also attempted to obtain a repatriation visa in Israel, but the court considered this a potential precondition for leaving the territory of Ukraine.

Nasirov also gained attention for his political career. Despite serious charges against him, he ran for the office of President of Ukraine in 2019, but ended up at the bottom of the rankings.

Nasirov is also known for the incident when the suspicion was read to him in Feofania Hospital, and he was later taken to court covered in a checkered blanket.

During the judicial debate on April 9, 2025, it became known that Nasirov voluntarily mobilized into the ranks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. However, the Military Law Enforcement Service reported the very next day that the commander had deemed the order to summon the ex-official unlawful and had annulled it. All materials were then handed over to the law enforcement authorities for proper legal assessment.

Roman Nasirov is also accused of receiving a record bribe of UAH 722 million. According to the investigation, he received this bribe from a businessman Oleh Bakhmatiuk, the owner of the Ukrlandfarming agricultural holding. Evidence in this case is still being investigated.

  • Proceeding No.: 52017000000000218
  • Case No.: 761/40713/17
  • Incriminated: Article 364, part 2
Instance Key parties Instance /Key parties:
HACC
25/10/2019

Panel of judges: Strohyi I.L.

Infographics

CASE OF ROMAN NASIROV

Nasirov, the ex-head of the SFS, allegedly illegally delayed rent payments for the use of subsoil to companies involved in the “gas scheme” of former MP Onyshchenko. 

Part 2 of Article 364 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine

(Part 1 of Article 366 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine exempted from liability due to the expiration of the statute of limitations)

  • In 2015–2016
    Nasirov signed decisions to defer tax debts for the companies under Onyshchenko's control.
  • March 3, 2017
    Nasirov was removed from the post of the SFS head on suspicion of causing UAH 2 billion of losses to the state
  • pic
    March 7, 2017
    Solomianskyi Court of Kyiv took Nasirov into custody for 60 days with the right to post UAH 100 million bail
  • December 7, 2017
    Shevchenkivskyi District Court of Kyiv began considering the merits of the case
  • January 31, 2018
    The Cabinet of Ministers dismissed Nasirov from the post of the SFS head
  • December 11, 2018
    Kyiv District Administrative Court reinstated Nasirov in his position
  • October 25, 2019
    The case was transferred to the HACC
  • November 19, 2019
    The HACC began considering the case on its merits
  • pic
    October 17, 2022
    The NABU served Nasirov with a new suspicion notice regarding his receipt of UAH 722 million in bribes for VAT refunds to companies of businessman Oleh Bakhmatiuk's agricultural holding
  • pic
    September 19, 2023
    The HACC released Nasirov from liability for forgery due to the expiration of the statute of limitations
  • September 17, 2024
    HACC Reduces Bail from UAH 31 mln to UAH 27 mln
  • April 9, 2025
    In connection with Nasirov's mobilization into the ranks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the defense requested to postpone the consideration of both cases against him. However, the very next day the order to mobilize him was canceled.

Decisions from the Register

Case No. Court Decision date Decision type
761/40713/17 HACC 25/10/2019 On the appointment of a preparatory court hearing
761/40713/17 HACC 08/11/2019
761/40713/17 HACC 31/01/2020
761/40713/17 HACC 31/01/2020
761/40713/17 HACC 27/04/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
761/40713/17 HACC 27/04/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
761/40713/17 HACC 04/05/2020
761/40713/17 HACC 04/05/2020
761/40713/17 HACC 04/05/2020
761/40713/17 HACC 04/05/2020
761/40713/17 HACC 22/05/2020 On changing the interim measure for the accused
761/40713/17 HACC 22/05/2020 On changing the interim measure for the accused
761/40713/17 HACC 20/08/2020
761/40713/17 HACC 20/08/2020
761/40713/17 HACC 28/09/2020
761/40713/17 HACC 28/09/2020
761/40713/17 HACC 01/12/2020
761/40713/17 HACC 01/12/2020
761/40713/17 HACC 07/06/2021
761/40713/17 HACC 09/06/2021
761/40713/17 HACC 01/11/2021
761/40713/17 HACC 01/11/2021
761/40713/17 HACC 09/11/2021 On changing the interim measure for the accused
761/40713/17 HACC 09/11/2021 On changing the interim measure for the accused
761/40713/17 HACC 13/12/2021 On changing the interim measure for the accused
761/40713/17 HACC 13/12/2021 On changing the interim measure for the accused
761/40713/17 HACC 11/01/2022 Decision on the return of bail
761/40713/17 HACC 17/03/2022
761/40713/17 HACC 17/05/2022 On changing the interim measure for the accused
761/40713/17 HACC 17/05/2022 On changing the interim measure for the accused
761/40713/17 HACC 07/06/2022 On changing the interim measure for the accused
761/40713/17 HACC 07/06/2022 On changing the interim measure for the accused
761/40713/17 HACC 18/01/2023
761/40713/17 HACC 20/01/2023
761/40713/17 HACC 24/01/2023
761/40713/17 HACC 31/01/2023
761/40713/17 HACC 31/01/2023
761/40713/17 HACC 24/05/2023
761/40713/17 HACC 20/06/2023 On changing the interim measure for the accused
761/40713/17 HACC 20/06/2023 On changing the interim measure for the accused
761/40713/17 HACC 12/09/2023
761/40713/17 HACC 12/09/2023
761/40713/17 HACC 19/09/2023 Decision on closing the criminal proceedings
761/40713/17 HACC 21/09/2023 On changing the interim measure for the accused
761/40713/17 HACC 21/09/2023 On changing the interim measure for the accused
761/40713/17 HACC 27/09/2023 Decision on closing the criminal proceedings
761/40713/17 HACC 15/12/2023 On changing the interim measure for the accused
761/40713/17 HACC 15/12/2023 On changing the interim measure for the accused
761/40713/17 HACC 26/01/2024
761/40713/17 HACC 26/01/2024
761/40713/17 HACC 23/04/2024 On changing the interim measure for the accused
761/40713/17 HACC 23/04/2024 On changing the interim measure for the accused
761/40713/17 HACC 21/05/2024
761/40713/17 HACC 23/05/2024
761/40713/17 HACC 28/05/2024
761/40713/17 HACC 10/06/2024
761/40713/17 HACC 11/06/2024
761/40713/17 HACC 13/06/2024 On changing the interim measure for the accused
761/40713/17 HACC 13/06/2024 On changing the interim measure for the accused
761/40713/17 HACC 17/09/2024 On changing the interim measure for the accused, Decision on the return of bail
761/40713/17 HACC 17/09/2024 On changing the interim measure for the accused, Decision on the return of bail
761/40713/17 HACC 29/11/2024 On changing the interim measure for the accused