Search

Case of the Odesa ex-judge Pavlo Medentsev on extortion of a bribe

  • Date of commencement of the case: 18/11/2019
Track case progress If you would like to follow the case, leave your email and get updates sent straight to your inbox
Case of the Odesa ex-judge Pavlo Medentsev on extortion of a bribe Case of the Odesa ex-judge Pavlo Medentsev on extortion of a bribe

Case description

On October 7, 2021, the HACC found Pavlo Medentsev, ex-judge of the Commercial Court of Odesa Oblast, guilty of receiving a bribe of more than half a million hryvnias. He was sentenced in absentia to 9 years with confiscation of all property and a ban on holding certain positions for three years.

On February 19, 2014, the Commercial Court of Odesa Oblast received a case on the claim of PE Smartkom against PJSC Insurance Company Harantia to recover UAH 2.3 mln of insurance indemnity.

Medentsev demanded money from the head of this private enterprise for partial satisfaction of the claims. He estimated such a “service” at UAH 570,000 and received a bribe in three tranches (twice in his office).

 

After the first tranche, the head of the enterprise appealed to law enforcement officers because she suspected that it was judge Medentsev who would sign the necessary ruling. Subsequently, law enforcement officers handed the money to the whistleblower, and the ex-judge was caught on April 1, 2014, after receiving the last UAH 270,000 of the bribe. This money was confiscated, but whether the first two parts of the bribe were seized is unknown.

Unfortunately, Medentsev managed to escape before his detention was approved by parliamentarians. Presumably, he is still hiding in Russia.

The HACC qualified this crime under Article 368, part 5 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. The court heard this case in the absence of the accused; Medentsev was sentenced to 9 years in prison in absentia with special confiscation of all property and deprivation of the right to hold judicial and other positions for 3 years.

The ex-judge's lawyer filed an appeal, but as a result of its consideration, the verdict of first instance remained in force.

  • Proceeding No.: 42014000000000071
  • Case No.: 385/619/16-к
  • Incriminated: Article 368, part 4
Instance Key parties Instance /Key parties:
HACC AC
13/11/2020

Panel of judges: Pankulych V.I., Bodnar S.B., Panaid I.V.

Lawyer: Veselova A.V., Bezuhloho V.D.

Prosecutor: Perov A.V.

HACC
18/11/2019

Panel of judges: Koliush O.L., Tkachenko O.V., Shkodin Ya.V.

Lawyer: Veselova A.V., Bezuhloho V.D.

Prosecutor: Perov A.V.

Infographics

Case of Pavlo Medentsev

Odesa ex-judge Pavlo Medentsev demanded a bribe of half a million hryvnias from the head of PE Smartkom for satisfying the claims in a commercial court. At that time, the judge managed to escape abroad, so he was sentenced in absentia.

  • On April 1, 2014
    Medentsev received the last tranche of a bribe and was caught by law enforcement officers red-handed
  • pic
    On April 29, 2014
    the Prosecutor General's Office served Medentsev with a suspicion notice
  • On May 20, 2014
    the Prosecutor General's Office put Medentsev on the wanted list
  • On May 22, 2014
    the Commercial Court of Appeal of Odesa Oblast overturned Medentsev's decision in the Smartkom case
  • On June 30, 2015
    the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine gave consent to the detention and arrest of judge Medentsev
  • On September 16, 2016
    the then President Petro Poroshenko dismissed Medentsev from the post of the judge for violating his oath
  • pic
    On October 7, 2020
    the HACC found Medentsev guilty and sentenced him to 9 years in prison, additionally confiscating all his property and banning him from holding certain positions for 3 years
  • On February 19, 2021
    the HACC Appeals Chamber upheld the verdict of the first instance

Decisions from the Register

Case No. Court Decision date Decision type
385/619/16-к HACC 18/11/2019 On the appointment of a preparatory court hearing
385/619/16-к HACC 12/12/2019 Decision on the refusal/granting of the motion for the return of the indictment
385/619/16-к HACC 12/12/2019 Decision on the refusal/granting of the motion for the return of the indictment
385/619/16-к HACC 14/01/2020 On the appointment of a trial
385/619/16-к HACC 14/01/2020 On the appointment of a trial
385/619/16-к HACC 03/03/2020
385/619/16-к HACC 01/04/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
385/619/16-к HACC 09/04/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
385/619/16-к HACC 24/04/2020
385/619/16-к HACC 15/05/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
385/619/16-к HACC 21/05/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
385/619/16-к HACC 02/06/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
385/619/16-к HACC 04/06/2020
385/619/16-к HACC 04/06/2020
385/619/16-к HACC 24/09/2020
385/619/16-к HACC AC 13/11/2020 Opening of appeal proceedings
385/619/16-к HACC AC 09/12/2020 Decision on the reclamation of materials
385/619/16-к HACC AC 09/12/2020 Completion of the preparation and appointment of the appeal hearing
385/619/16-к HACC 19/02/2021 Verdicts
385/619/16-к HACC AC 19/02/2021 On non-granting of the appeal and leaving the verdict unchanged
385/619/16-к HACC AC 19/02/2021 On non-granting of the appeal and leaving the verdict unchanged