Fake UN Farm Equipment for a Bribe: The Case of Two Farmers from Ivano-Frankivsk Region

Fake UN Farm Equipment for a Bribe: The Case of Two Farmers from Ivano-Frankivsk Region
Start of the trial 14 December 2023
Date of verdict 3 November 2025
Instance HACC
Stage of criminal proceedings Implementing the decision

The HACC approved plea agreements with Volodymyr Oleniuk, director of the Baika farm, and Yurii Ivasiuk, head of Livestock Paryshche A LLC. They were found guilty of fraud and of incitement to give a bribe.

In 2023, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) was running a charitable initiative in Ukraine to support farmers in the difficult conditions of the war. The program provided for the free transfer to farmers of specialized equipment for loading and unloading grain bags, allowing them to store their harvest directly in the fields if grain elevators were damaged.

According to the investigation, between January and May 2023 two residents of Ivano-Frankivsk Region, Volodymyr Oleniuk and Yurii Ivasiuk, acting by prior conspiracy, devised a scheme to misappropriate funds from Agrokrai LLC. Passing themselves off as official FAO representatives, they approached an employee of the agricultural firm with an offer of "assistance" in obtaining grain storage bags as part of the humanitarian aid.

To do so, the defendants said, a total of UAH 560,000 in unlawful benefit had to be paid to the FAO leadership. To lend the scheme greater weight, the perpetrators invoked purported arrangements with a senior official who had previously headed the State Agricultural Inspectorate of Ukraine and now worked at the FAO as head of the project supplying equipment to agricultural enterprises.

In reality, the men had no intention of passing the money to anyone and planned to appropriate it. The money was handed over in several portions. The defendants first received UAH 40,000, then a further UAH 15,000. They were detained by law enforcement on May 23, 2023, while receiving the main sum of UAH 505,000.

The defendants' actions were classified under Article 27(4) in conjunction with Article 369(3), and Article 190(3) of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. The prosecution insisted that their conduct amounted to a cynical manipulation of international aid. Volodymyr Oleniuk and Yurii Ivasiuk not only sought to enrich themselves at the expense of UN humanitarian aid in wartime, but also put Ukraine's reputation with foreign donors at risk.

In November 2025, the HACC delivered a verdict approving the plea agreements and imposing on both defendants the agreed sentence of five years' imprisonment.

The defendants fully and unreservedly admitted their guilt in the offenses charged. They entered plea agreements with a SAPO prosecutor, under which they undertook to cooperate with the investigation and to repay the UAH 55,000 they had appropriated; Oleniuk was also to hand over two of his own vehicles — a Mitsubishi Pajero and a Skoda — for the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

On the basis of Article 75 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, the court released them from serving their sentences on probation, setting a probationary period of two years for Ivasiuk and three years for Oleniuk. During this period they are required to report periodically to the authorized probation body for registration; to notify that body of any change of residence, employment, or place of study; and not to leave Ukraine without the body's approval.

In determining the sentence, the court also took into account mitigating circumstances — the defendants' sincere remorse, their active assistance in solving the offense, and positive character references. Yurii Ivasiuk is a serviceman who was wounded in combat and holds state awards, including the Order of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi, 3rd class. Oleniuk, for his part, is active in volunteer work and provides financial support to the army.

The verdict has entered into force.

Proceeding No. 52023000000000042
Case No. 991/10819/23
Date the hearing was scheduled 14/12/2023
Subject
  • Business
Qualification
Article 369, part 3, Article 190, part 3
Pre-trial cases №
  • 991/9998/23
  • 991/6421/23
  • 991/6420/23
  • 991/5503/23
  • 991/5137/23
  • 991/5136/23
  • 991/4703/23
  • 991/4700/23
  • 991/4546/23
  • 991/4548/23
  • 991/4500/23
  • 991/4501/23
  • 991/4542/23
  • 991/4232/23
  • 991/4179/23
  • 991/4125/23
  • 991/4126/23
  • 991/4121/23
  • 991/4122/23
  • 991/2523/23
  • 991/2524/23
  • 991/2522/23
  • 991/2521/23
  • 991/2519/23
  • 991/2520/23
  • 991/1696/23
  • 991/1698/23
  • 991/1697/23
  • 991/1458/23
  • 991/1457/23
  • 991/1459/23
  • 991/1453/23
  • 991/1461/23
  • 991/1111/23
Instance Key parties
HACC 14/12/2023 Panel of judges: Khamzin T.R.
THE CASE OF OLENIUK AND IVASIUK
Implementing the decision

The HACC approved plea agreements with businessmen Volodymyr Oleniuk and Yurii Ivasiuk. They received suspended sentences for attempting to misappropriate over half a million hryvnias from an agricultural firm.

  • January 27, 2023
    criminal proceedings were opened over the extortion of money for humanitarian aid
  • pic
    January 25 – May 23, 2023
    the defendants carried out the criminal scheme; Oleniuk and Ivasiuk received the money in three tranches from an engineer at Agrokrai LLC
  • pic
    May 23, 2023
    the defendants were caught red-handed while receiving the final tranche of the bribe, UAH 505,000
  • pic
    May 24, 2023
    the defendants were remanded in custody, with bail as an alternative: UAH 402,600 for Ivasiuk and UAH 252,500 for Oleniuk
  • May 26, 2023
    bail was posted for the defendants
  • August 17, 2023
    the pretrial investigation in the case was completed
  • December 14, 2023
    the HACC scheduled a preparatory hearing in the case
  • March 21, 2024
    the HACC moved to consideration of the case on the merits
  • October 3, 2025
    plea agreements were concluded between the SAPO prosecutor and the defendants
  • pic
    November 3, 2025
    the HACC approved the plea agreements. Oleniuk and Ivasiuk each received five years' imprisonment with a probationary period (three and two years respectively)

Decisions from the Register

Case No. Court Decision type
991/10819/23 HACC 03/11/2025 Verdicts, Decision to cancel the seizure of property
991/10819/23 HACC 21/03/2024 On the appointment of a trial
991/10819/23 HACC 21/03/2024 On the appointment of a trial
991/10819/23 HACC 14/12/2023 On the appointment of a preparatory court hearing
991/9998/23 HACC 20/11/2023
991/9998/23 HACC 20/11/2023
991/6421/23 HACC 20/07/2023
991/6420/23 HACC 20/07/2023
991/6420/23 HACC 20/07/2023
991/6421/23 HACC 20/07/2023
991/5503/23 HACC 28/06/2023
991/5503/23 HACC 28/06/2023
991/5137/23 HACC 15/06/2023
991/5136/23 HACC 15/06/2023
991/4703/23 HACC 13/06/2023
991/4703/23 HACC 13/06/2023
991/4700/23 HACC 08/06/2023
991/4700/23 HACC 08/06/2023
991/4546/23 HACC 31/05/2023
991/4548/23 HACC 31/05/2023
991/4546/23 HACC 31/05/2023
991/4548/23 HACC 31/05/2023
991/4500/23 HACC 30/05/2023
991/4501/23 HACC 30/05/2023 On the imposition of an interim measure in the form of detention
991/4500/23 HACC 30/05/2023
991/4501/23 HACC 30/05/2023 On the imposition of an interim measure in the form of detention
991/4542/23 HACC 24/05/2023
991/4542/23 HACC 24/05/2023
991/4232/23 HACC 15/05/2023
991/4232/23 HACC 15/05/2023
991/4179/23 HACC 12/05/2023
991/4179/23 HACC 12/05/2023
991/4125/23 HACC 11/05/2023
991/4126/23 HACC 11/05/2023
991/4121/23 HACC 11/05/2023
991/4122/23 HACC 11/05/2023
991/2523/23 HACC 27/03/2023
991/2523/23 HACC 27/03/2023
991/2524/23 HACC 27/03/2023
991/2522/23 HACC 27/03/2023
991/2524/23 HACC 27/03/2023
991/2521/23 HACC 27/03/2023
991/2519/23 HACC 27/03/2023
991/2520/23 HACC 27/03/2023
991/1696/23 HACC 24/02/2023
991/1698/23 HACC 24/02/2023
991/1696/23 HACC 24/02/2023
991/1697/23 HACC 24/02/2023
991/1698/23 HACC 24/02/2023
991/1697/23 HACC 24/02/2023
991/1458/23 HACC 23/02/2023
991/1457/23 HACC 23/02/2023
991/1459/23 HACC 23/02/2023
991/1453/23 HACC 22/02/2023
991/1461/23 HACC 22/02/2023
991/1461/23 HACC 22/02/2023
991/1453/23 HACC 22/02/2023
991/1111/23 HACC 08/02/2023