Search

Case of Odesa ex-judge Anatolii Tselukh on extortion of a bribe

  • Date of commencement of the case: 04/11/2019
Track case progress If you would like to follow the case, leave your email and get updates sent straight to your inbox
Case of Odesa ex-judge Anatolii Tselukh on extortion of a bribe Case of Odesa ex-judge Anatolii Tselukh on extortion of a bribe

Case description

On July 22, 2020, the HACC found the retired judge of the Malynovskyi District Court of Odesa guilty of extorting and receiving a bribe for the “correct” decision in the case related to the Odesa Radial Drill Plant. Tselukh was sentenced to 7 years in prison, but the appeal reduced the sentence to 5 years in prison.

In summer 2017, Tselukh, as a judge, received a lawsuit requesting to cancel the decision of the Odesa plant to allocate an apartment to another person. For a year and a half, there was no decision on the case, and in spring 2019, Tselukh demanded that the defendant's representative transfer USD 2,500 in bribes; for this money, the judge had to speed up the consideration of the case and facilitate the adoption of a positive decision in favor of the defendant.

The representative of the defendant informed the prosecutor's office about the crime of Tselukh, and subsequently, under the supervision of law enforcement officers, the bribe was handed over to the Odesa ex-judge right in his office. This amount was subsequently seized during the NABU search.

The crime was qualified under Art. 368, part 3 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Tselukh was sent to prison for 7 years, with confiscation of all property and deprivation of the right to hold the post of judge and any positions in law enforcement agencies for 3 years.

In August 2020, his lawyers filed a number of appeals, in which they noted that Tselukh had been provoked to commit a crime, and the evidence in the case was inadmissible. Therefore, the appeals requested the HACC Appeals Chamber to overturn the verdict and close the criminal proceedings against the judge. The Appeals Chamber decided to mitigate the punishment of Tselukh to 5 years in prison, but otherwise the verdict did not change.

Subsequently, the lawyers filed cassation appeals, but the Supreme Court did not change the punishment of Tselukh. 

  • Proceeding No.: 42019000000000589
  • Case No.: 487/5684/19
  • Incriminated: Article 368, part 3, Article 368, part 4
Instance Key parties Instance /Key parties:
CCC
08/04/2021

Panel of judges: Luhanskyi Yu.M., Anisimov H.M., Buleiko O.L., Kovtunovych M.I.

Lawyer: Yermolatina V.I., Markova O.S.

Prosecutor: Krychun V.V.

HACC AC
31/08/2020

Panel of judges: Mykhailenko D.H., Bodnar S.B., Panaid I.V.

Lawyer: Kozlova O.O., Yermolatina V.I.

HACC
04/11/2019

Panel of judges: Nohachevskyi V.V., Kryklyvyi V.V., Halabala M.V.

Lawyer: Markova O.S., Semenova V.I., Kozlova O.O., Muky A.O.

Prosecutor: Sniehirov O.M., Krychun V.V.

Infographics

CASE OF ANATOLII TSELUKH

Odesa judge Tselukh demanded a bribe for an accelerated trial and a positive decision in the case in favor of the defendant. For this, he was sentenced to imprisonment.

  • pic
    On March 29, 2019
    Tselukh received USD 2,500 in bribes from the representative of the defendant in a lawsuit to cancel the decision of the Odesa plant to allocate an apartment
  • pic
    On July 22, 2020
    the HACC found Tselukh guilty, sentenced him to 7 years in prison, confiscated all property, and banned him from holding certain positions for 3 years
  • On February 19, 2021
    the HACC Appeals Chamber considered the appeals of the lawyers and mitigated the main punishment of Tselukh to 5 years in prison
  • On October 22, 2021
    the Supreme Court considered the cassation appeals of the lawyers, but the scope of punishment of Tselukh remained unchanged

Decisions from the Register

Case No. Court Decision date Decision type
487/5684/19 HACC 10/10/2019
487/5684/19 HACC 04/11/2019 On the appointment of a trial
487/5684/19 HACC 04/11/2019
487/5684/19 HACC 04/11/2019 On the appointment of a trial
487/5684/19 HACC 03/06/2020
487/5684/19 HACC 09/06/2020
487/5684/19 HACC 10/07/2020
487/5684/19 HACC 22/07/2020 Verdicts
487/5684/19 HACC AC 27/08/2020 On leaving the appeal without action
487/5684/19 HACC AC 31/08/2020 Opening of appeal proceedings
487/5684/19 HACC AC 07/09/2020 Opening of appeal proceedings
487/5684/19 HACC AC 15/09/2020 Completion of the preparation and appointment of the appeal hearing
487/5684/19 HACC AC 02/12/2020
487/5684/19 HACC AC 14/12/2020
487/5684/19 HACC AC 19/02/2021 On partial granting of the appeal and change of the verdict
487/5684/19 HACC AC 19/02/2021 On partial granting of the appeal and change of the verdict
487/5684/19 CCC 29/03/2021 On leaving the cassation appeal without motion
487/5684/19 CCC 08/04/2021 On the opening of cassation proceedings
487/5684/19 CCC 08/04/2021
487/5684/19 CCC 27/04/2021 On the completion of preparation and appointment of the cassation hearing
487/5684/19 CCC 03/06/2021 On leaving the cassation appeal without motion
487/5684/19 CCC 02/07/2021 On the opening of cassation proceedings
487/5684/19 CCC 31/08/2021
487/5684/19 CCC 29/09/2021
487/5684/19 CCC 22/10/2021 Resolution on partial granting of cassation appeals and a change in court decisions
487/5684/19 CCC 22/10/2021 Resolution on partial granting of cassation appeals and a change in court decisions