Search

The Case of Damages to SE Ukrzaliznychpostach

  • Date of commencement of the case: 18/09/2019
  • Instance: HACC
  • Stage of criminal proceedings: Judicial proceedings
Track case progress If you would like to follow the case, leave your email and get updates sent straight to your inbox
The Case of Damages to SE Ukrzaliznychpostach The Case of Damages to SE Ukrzaliznychpostach

Case description

The NABU and SAPO accuse three Ukrzaliznychpostach officials and one Ukrzaliznytsia official of misappropriation and embezzlement through abuse of office, causing particularly large financial losses to the state-owned enterprise.

According to the investigation, in 2015, the officials conspired with private company representatives to procure hardware products at inflated prices.

The case involves:

  • Nadiia Bohdan, Director of Inkomm LLC.
  • Dmytro Tsivun, Financial Director of Souz-Energo LLC.
  • Yevhen Khoroshchak, former Director of Ukrzaliznychpostach.
  • Roman Kravchuk, Khoroshchak's former deputy.
  • Andrii Stepanenko, Head of the Track Superstructure Department at Ukrzaliznychpostach.

Thus, the investigation alleges that Bohdan prepared a fictitious certificate, enabling the tender committee of Ukrzaliznychpostach to accept the proposal from Inkomm LLC despite its non-compliance with the tender documentation. Furthermore, the defendants submitted false information that the company had made a profit in 2015 and had no overdue accounts payable.

 

Due to inflated procurement prices for hardware products, the state-owned enterprise suffered losses exceeding UAH 20 million. In 2016, the same group attempted a similar scheme, but the Antimonopoly Committee intervened and canceled the procurement, preventing additional losses of nearly UAH 44 million.

The defendants were charged under Article 191, Part 5 and Article 209, Part 3 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.

Based on plea agreements, the HACC found Nadiia Bohdan and Dmytro Tsivun guilty. They were sentenced to five years in prison with a two-year probationary period, fined UAH 17,000, and banned from holding certain positions for three years. Also, they were ordered to pay UAH 100,000 in procedural costs and pledged to transfer UAH 2 million to support the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

Notably, former MP Ishchenko and Ukrainian businessman Oleksii Bilenkyi, believed to be a beneficiary of the Inkomm group of companies, are also suspects in this case.

  • Proceeding No.: 52016000000000001
  • Case No.: 760/6099/17 show all cases hide other cases
  • Other court cases No.: 991/1068/25
  • Incriminated: Article 191, part 5, Article 364, part 2, Article 209, part 3, Article 366, part 1
Instance Key parties Instance /Key parties:
HACC
18/09/2019

Panel of judges: Shkodin Ya.V.

Infographics

The Case of Damages to SE Ukrzaliznychpostach

Three Ukrzaliznychpostach employees and one official of Ukrzaliznytsia are accused of misappropriation and embezzlement of property with losses of over UAH 20 million.

Article 191, Part 5 and Article 209, Part 3 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine

  • pic
    April – November 2015
    Defendants are making procurements at inflated prices
  • January 11, 2016
    NABU detectives begin investigating the case
  • pic
    2016
    An attempt to repeat the crime was stopped by the Antimonopoly Committee
  • pic
    July 13, 2016
    Stepanenko is placed under house arrest
  • July 5, 2016
    Kravchuk is taken into custody with an alternative bail set at UAH 2.856 million
  • pic
    October 27, 2016
    Khoroshchak is detained and placed under house arrest
  • pic
    November 1, 2016
    NABU notifies four additional suspects
  • pic
    November 6, 2017
    Tsivun and Bohdan are placed under house arrest
  • pic
    March 30, 2017
    Indictment submitted to court
  • February 14, 2025
    HACC finds Tsivun and Bohdan guilty

Decisions from the Register

Case No. Court Decision date Decision type
760/6099/17 HACC 30/11/-0001 Separate opinion of the HACC judge
760/6099/17 HACC 18/09/2019 On the appointment of a preparatory court hearing
760/6099/17 HACC AC 15/10/2019 On the refusal to open appeal proceedings
760/6099/17 CCC 15/10/2019
760/6099/17 CCC 22/10/2019
760/6099/17 HACC AC 28/10/2019 Opening of appeal proceedings
760/6099/17 CCC 29/10/2019
760/6099/17 HACC AC 04/11/2019 Completion of the preparation and appointment of the appeal hearing
760/6099/17 HACC AC 06/12/2019 On closing appeal proceedings
760/6099/17 HACC AC 06/12/2019 On closing appeal proceedings
760/6099/17 HACC AC 06/12/2019 Separate opinion of the HACC AC judge
760/6099/17 HACC AC 18/12/2019 On the appointment of a new trial in the court of the first instance
760/6099/17 HACC AC 10/01/2020
760/6099/17 HACC AC 10/01/2020
760/6099/17 HACC 30/01/2020
760/6099/17 HACC 30/01/2020
760/6099/17 HACC 30/01/2020
760/6099/17 CCC 16/03/2020 On the refusal to open cassation proceedings
760/6099/17 HACC 11/06/2020
760/6099/17 HACC 11/06/2020
760/6099/17 HACC 30/07/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
760/6099/17 HACC 13/08/2020
760/6099/17 HACC 13/08/2020
760/6099/17 HACC AC 21/09/2020
760/6099/17 HACC AC 21/09/2020
760/6099/17 CCC 02/10/2020 On the return of the cassation appeal
760/6099/17 HACC AC 19/10/2020 On the refusal to open appeal proceedings
760/6099/17 CCC 02/11/2020 On the refusal to open cassation proceedings
760/6099/17 HACC 12/11/2020 On the appointment of a trial
760/6099/17 HACC 12/11/2020 On the appointment of a trial
760/6099/17 CCC 17/11/2020 On leaving the cassation appeal without motion
760/6099/17 CCC 03/12/2020 On the return of the cassation appeal
760/6099/17 HACC 02/04/2021 Decision on exemption from criminal liability on the basis of Art. 49 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine in connection with the expiration of the statute of limitations
760/6099/17 HACC 02/04/2021 Decision on exemption from criminal liability on the basis of Art. 49 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine in connection with the expiration of the statute of limitations
760/6099/17 HACC 01/11/2021 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
760/6099/17 HACC 10/01/2022 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
760/6099/17 HACC 16/02/2022 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
760/6099/17 HACC 18/05/2022 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
760/6099/17 HACC 01/06/2022 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
760/6099/17 HACC 06/07/2022 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
760/6099/17 HACC 01/08/2022 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
760/6099/17 HACC 31/08/2022 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
760/6099/17 HACC 24/10/2022 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
760/6099/17 HACC 16/01/2023 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
991/1068/25 HACC 14/02/2025 Decision to cancel the seizure of property, Verdicts