Search

Bribery case against ex-judge Mykhailo Krentsel and lawyer Nataliia Lisna

  • Date of commencement of the case: 27/09/2019
Track case progress If you would like to follow the case, leave your email and get updates sent straight to your inbox
Bribery case against ex-judge Mykhailo Krentsel and lawyer Nataliia Lisna Bribery case against ex-judge Mykhailo Krentsel and lawyer Nataliia Lisna

Case description

On September 2, 2021, the HACC found Ternopil judge Mykhailo Krentsel and lawyer Nataliia Lisna guilty of extortion for “resolving” a local resident's issue in court.

Mykhailo Krentsel is a retired judge who worked at the Koziv District Court in Ternopil Region since 1994. He demanded UAS 2,000 through lawyer Nataliia Lisna; for this money, he was supposed to refuse to cancel the applicant's probation at the request of the penitentiary service.

The applicant, a local, had previously been convicted of theft, but was exempted from the actual sentence with a probationary period of 3 years. He did not report to the relevant services, so a motion was filed to return him to the place of detention. Lisna promised to help by making arrangements with Judge Krentsel.

The lawyer assured him that part of the judge would receive a part of the USD 2,000 bribe, and the prosecutor would receive another part. In reality, however, Krentsel received only USD 400, and Lisna took the rest. But despite this, the ex-judge still refused to grant the motion, as promised in exchange for a bribe.

The HACC only received the case in September 2019. Since April 2016, the case had been heard in three different courts, where the charges were supposed to be considered. 

Krentsel's actions were classified under Article 368, part 3 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, and Lisna's actions were classified as an accomplice—under Article 27, part 5, Article 368, part 3 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Krentsel was sentenced to 6 years in prison and banned from holding a number of positions for 3 years with confiscation of all his property. Lawyer Lisna was imprisoned for 5 years, lost her right to practice law for 2 years, and half of her property was confiscated.

The case is currently being heard in the appellate instance.

  • Proceeding No.: 52016000000000025
  • Case No.: 349/508/16-к
  • Incriminated: Article 368, part 3
Instance Key parties Instance /Key parties:
CCC
26/08/2024

Panel of judges: Loboiko L.M.

HACC AC
08/10/2021

Panel of judges: Nykyforov A.S., Pavlyshyn O.F., Chorna V.V.

Lawyer: Horbuliaka I.V.

Prosecutor: Shchur I.V.

HACC
27/09/2019

Panel of judges: Bilous I.O., Kravchuk O.O., Kruk Ye.V.

Lawyer: Horbuliaka I.V., Aliieva V.V.

Prosecutor: Shchura B.M., Shchur I.V., Omelchenko O.M.

Infographics

Bribery case against ex-judge Mykhailo Krentsel and lawyer Nataliia Lisna

Ternopil ex-judge Mykhailo Krentsel was convicted of extorting a bribe from a local through lawyer Nataliia Lisna. For USD 2,000, the judge was to dismiss the motion against this resident.

  • February 16, 2016
    Krentsel was exposed while receiving a USD 400 bribe
  • September 22, 2016
    The HCJ dismissed Krenzel upon his own resignation
  • pic
    September 2, 2021
    the HACC found Krentsel and Lisna guilty, sentencing them to 6 and 5 years in prison with additional penalties

Decisions from the Register

Case No. Court Decision date Decision type
349/508/16-к HACC 27/09/2019 On the appointment of a preparatory court hearing
349/508/16-к HACC 28/10/2019
349/508/16-к HACC 18/12/2019 On the appointment of a trial
349/508/16-к HACC 15/06/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
349/508/16-к HACC 28/07/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
349/508/16-к HACC 24/09/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
349/508/16-к HACC 27/11/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
349/508/16-к HACC 14/12/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
349/508/16-к HACC 28/01/2021 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
349/508/16-к HACC 16/02/2021 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
349/508/16-к HACC 17/02/2021 Decision on the consideration of a recusal
349/508/16-к HACC 02/03/2021 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
349/508/16-к HACC 29/03/2021 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
349/508/16-к HACC 28/04/2021 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
349/508/16-к HACC 11/05/2021 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
349/508/16-к HACC 03/08/2021 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
349/508/16-к HACC 02/09/2021 Verdicts
349/508/16-к HACC AC 08/10/2021 On the return of the appeal
349/508/16-к HACC AC 08/10/2021 On leaving the appeal without action
349/508/16-к HACC AC 08/10/2021 Opening of appeal proceedings
349/508/16-к HACC AC 18/10/2021 Completion of the preparation and appointment of the appeal hearing
349/508/16-к HACC AC 21/10/2021 Opening of appeal proceedings
349/508/16-к HACC AC 01/11/2021 Completion of the preparation and appointment of the appeal hearing
349/508/16-к HACC AC 06/12/2021 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
349/508/16-к HACC AC 06/12/2021 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
349/508/16-к HACC AC 16/05/2024 On partial granting of the appeal and change of the verdict
349/508/16-к HACC AC 16/05/2024 On partial granting of the appeal and change of the verdict
349/508/16-к CCC 17/07/2024 On leaving the cassation appeal without motion
349/508/16-к HACC 20/07/2024
349/508/16-к CCC 29/07/2024 On leaving the cassation appeal without motion
349/508/16-к CCC 26/08/2024
349/508/16-к CCC 26/08/2024 On the opening of cassation proceedings
349/508/16-к HACC 27/08/2024
349/508/16-к HACC 27/08/2024