The Case of the Embezzlement of the “Kyoto Money”

The Case of the Embezzlement of the “Kyoto Money”
Start of the trial 18 September 2019
Instance HACC
Stage of criminal proceedings Judicial proceedings

The NABU and the SAPO accuse the former director of Ukrainian Ecological Investments SE, Oleksii Koval; the head of the municipal enterprise Odesmisksvitlo, which operates external-lighting electrical networks, Oleksandr Prokopets; the former deputy chief engineer of the South Ukraine Nuclear Power Plant, Dmytro Sokolov; and others in a case concerning the attempted embezzlement of state funds allocated to Ukraine under the Kyoto Protocol to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.

The case also involves employees of Ukrekoresurs SE and members of the competitive bidding committee:

  • Vadym Levchenko;
  • Oksana Dobrylovska;
  • Roman Kravchenko.

According to the investigation, the Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources of Ukraine was to implement a project to replace lighting fixtures at social infrastructure facilities with LED lighting using Kyoto Protocol funds.

At the same time, the pre-trial investigation established that officials of the state enterprise responsible for organizing the procurement, in collusion with representatives of private companies, set up a scheme to misappropriate these funds.

In November 2015, tenders were announced for a total of more than UAH 783 million, and as a result a significant portion of the contracts — worth more than UAH 480 million — went to an enterprise with signs of fictitiousness.

The scheme for embezzling the “Kyoto money.” Source: NABU
The scheme for embezzling the “Kyoto money.” Source: NABU

The procurements were accompanied by a simulation of competition. Interconnected companies took part in the bidding, submitting coordinated bids — one at a slightly higher price, the other with formal deficiencies in its documents. In a number of procedures, only these participants were admitted to evaluation, even though their bids did not meet the requirements of the tender documentation. In addition, the companies used identical document packages and the same material and technical resources, and opened accounts at the same bank within a minimal time interval, which indicates the coordinated nature of their actions.

The investigation believes that the participants did not plan to perform the work under the contracts, and that the funds received — in particular in the form of substantial advance payments — were to be transferred to the accounts of controlled enterprises with signs of fictitiousness and withdrawn from oversight.

According to a forensic economic examination, the potential losses amount to around UAH 336 million, while the total sum that they attempted to misappropriate exceeds UAH 480 million.

The actions of the participants in the scheme were classified under Article 191(5) and Article 366(1) of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Levchenko and Sokolov have been put on the wanted list.

According to the SAPO, two individuals have already been convicted within this case — A. Sliepchenko and O. Bezpala — for fictitious entrepreneurship (Article 205(1) of the Criminal Code of Ukraine).

Proceeding No. 32016100000000003
Case No. 760/9748/17
Date the hearing was scheduled 18/09/2019
Subjects
  • Other
  • Head of a state or municipal enterprise/institution
Qualification
Article 191, part 5, Article 191, part 2, Article 366, part 1
Merged with
Instance Key parties
HACC 18/09/2019 Panel of judges: Serdyukova I.O., Kravchuk O.O.
THE CASE OF THE EMBEZZLEMENT OF KYOTO MONEY
Judicial proceedings

According to the investigation, officials of a state enterprise, in collusion with private companies, organized fictitious tenders for the replacement of lighting using Kyoto Protocol funds.

  • pic
    November 2015
    the individuals in the case organized tenders in which predetermined companies with signs of fictitiousness were declared the winners
  • January 21, 2016
    the pre-trial investigation began
  • pic
    May–July 2016
    the individuals in the case were served with a notice of suspicion
  • pic
    June 6, 2017
    the indictment was referred to court
  • pic
    September 17, 2019
    the case materials were transferred to the HACC from the Solomianskyi District Court of Kyiv
  • September 18, 2019
    the HACC scheduled the first preparatory hearing
  • August 25, 2020
    the court ruled to try Levchenko in absentia
  • January 18, 2021
    the HACC closed the criminal proceedings under Article 205(1) of the Criminal Code of Ukraine in connection with the decriminalization of that article
  • July 29, 2021
    the HACC again scheduled a preparatory hearing in the joined case
  • August 9, 2021
    the HACC referred the case for consideration on the merits

Decisions from the Register

Case No. Court Decision type
760/9748/17 HACC 05/11/2025
760/9748/17 HACC 05/11/2025
760/9748/17 HACC 16/07/2025
760/9748/17 HACC 14/07/2025
760/9748/17 HACC 06/02/2024
760/9748/17 HACC 06/02/2024
760/9748/17 HACC 23/01/2024
760/9748/17 HACC 05/12/2023
760/9748/17 HACC 05/09/2023
760/9748/17 HACC 16/05/2023
760/9748/17 HACC 13/09/2022
760/9748/17 HACC 09/08/2021 Decision on the refusal/granting of the motion for the return of the indictment
760/9748/17 HACC 09/08/2021 Decision on the refusal/granting of the motion for the return of the indictment
760/9748/17 HACC 09/08/2021
760/9748/17 HACC 09/08/2021 On the appointment of a trial
760/9748/17 HACC 09/08/2021
760/9748/17 HACC 09/08/2021 On the appointment of a trial
760/9748/17 HACC 05/08/2021
760/9748/17 HACC 29/07/2021 On the appointment of a preparatory court hearing
760/9748/17 HACC 20/07/2021
760/9748/17 HACC 20/07/2021
760/9748/17 HACC 16/07/2021 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
760/9748/17 HACC 29/04/2021 On the appointment of a preparatory court hearing
760/9748/17 HACC 19/04/2021
760/9748/17 HACC AC 19/04/2021
760/9748/17 HACC AC 19/04/2021
760/9748/17 HACC AC 30/03/2021
760/9748/17 HACC AC 16/03/2021
760/9748/17 HACC AC 16/03/2021
760/9748/17 HACC AC 11/02/2021 Completion of the preparation and appointment of the appeal hearing
760/9748/17 HACC AC 01/02/2021 Opening of appeal proceedings
760/9748/17 HACC 26/01/2021
760/9748/17 HACC 26/01/2021
760/9748/17 HACC 18/01/2021
760/9748/17 HACC 18/01/2021
760/9748/17 HACC 18/01/2021
760/9748/17 HACC 06/11/2020
760/9748/17 HACC 06/11/2020
760/9748/17 HACC 24/09/2020
760/9748/17 HACC 03/09/2020
760/9748/17 HACC 25/08/2020 On the enforcement of special court proceedings
760/9748/17 HACC 03/08/2020
760/9748/17 HACC 29/07/2020
760/9748/17 HACC 05/06/2020 On the appointment of a preparatory court hearing
760/9748/17 HACC 05/06/2020 On the enforcement of special court proceedings
760/9748/17 HACC 05/06/2020 On the appointment of a preparatory court hearing
760/9748/17 HACC 05/06/2020 On the enforcement of special court proceedings
760/9748/17 HACC 04/06/2020
760/9748/17 HACC 18/02/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
760/9748/17 HACC 18/02/2020
760/9748/17 HACC 04/12/2019
760/9748/17 HACC 04/12/2019
760/9748/17 HACC 18/09/2019 On the appointment of a preparatory court hearing