Search

The case of bribery of Andrii Maksymenko, head of Mykolaiv Road Service

  • Date of commencement of the case: 03/03/2020
Track case progress If you would like to follow the case, leave your email and get updates sent straight to your inbox
The case of bribery of Andrii Maksymenko, head of Mykolaiv Road Service The case of bribery of Andrii Maksymenko, head of Mykolaiv Road Service

Case description

On May 5, 2022, the High Anti-Corruption Court found Andrii Maksymenko, head of the Mykolaiv Road Service, guilty of receiving USD 90,000 and UAH 300,000 in bribes for the road's compliance with the terms of a contract with a private company to repair the H-11 Dnipro-Mykolaiv highway. He got a 5-year suspended sentence.

Andrii Maksymenko was the head of the Road Service in the Mykolaiv region. In the summer of 2018, the Road Service signed a contract with PE Poltavabudtsentr for the current medium-term repair of the H-11 Dnipro-Mykolaiv highway section.

 

According to the investigation, in 2019, Maksymenko demanded a bribe from a Poltavabudtsentr official for the Road Service to pay for the actual road repairs, and later repeated this demand again. In August, Maksymenko received the first tranche of a bribe of UAH 300,000, and in September, he received USD 90,000. The official was detained in Odesa while receiving the second part of the bribe.

Interestingly, in the summer of 2019, people protested on the highway between Dnipro and Mykolaiv, demanding that the road be repaired as soon as possible. In autumn 2018, people spent the night on the highway leading from Mykolaiv to Kropyvnytskyi, demanding that the holes in the emergency road be repaired. During his visit, Zelenskyy personally instructed Maksymenko to repair roads in the region, but the latter said there was not enough money for this. 

Maksymenko's actions were classified under Article 368, part 3; Article 27, part 4; Article 369, part 2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. He concluded a plea agreement with the prosecutor, so he got a 5-year suspended sentence with a probationary period of 3 years, was fined UAH 17,000, and banned from holding certain positions for 2 years. The HACC also confiscated UAH 100,000 into the national budget.

  • Proceeding No.: 52019000000000714
  • Case No.: 991/1818/20 show all cases hide other cases
  • Other court cases No.: 4910/41/19, 991/326/20, 991/1181/20
  • Incriminated: Article 368, part 4, Article 369, part 2, Article 368, part 3
Instance Key parties Instance /Key parties:
HACC
03/03/2020

Panel of judges: Voronko V.D., Khamzin T.R., Koliush O.L., Dubas V.M., Tkachenko O.V.

Lawyer: Babikova O.P., Tesliuka P.V., Semenovycha S.M., Ryzhuk M.S., Sinichenka I.S.

Prosecutor: Semak I.A., Skybenko O.I.

Infographics

THE CASE OF ANDRII MAKSYMENKO

Andrii Maksymenko, the former head of the Mykolaiv Road Service, demanded and received a bribe from a representative of a private company for paying for the actual repair of the highway. 

  • July 11, 2018
    the Road Service and PE Poltavabudtsentr signed a contract for the repair of the H-11 highway section
  • July 17, 2019
    Zelenskyy instructed Maksymenko to repair the most problematic roads in the Mykolaiv region
  • August 19, 2019
    Maksymenko received a bribe of UAH 300,000
  • September 11, 2019
    the NABU detained Maksymenko while he was receiving a USD 90,000 bribe
  • pic
    September 13, 2019
    The court took Maksymenko into custody with an alternative to bail
  • September 16, 2019
    UAH 1.9 million bail was posted for Maksymenko
  • pic
    May 5, 2022
    the HACC found Maksymenko guilty and imposed a 5-year suspended sentence on him with additional penalties based on a plea agreement with the prosecutor

Decisions from the Register

Case No. Court Decision date Decision type
4910/41/19 HACC 10/09/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 10/09/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 10/09/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 10/09/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 10/09/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 10/09/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 12/09/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 13/09/2019 On the imposition of an interim measure in the form of detention
4910/41/19 HACC 13/09/2019 On the imposition of an interim measure in the form of detention
4910/41/19 HACC AC 25/09/2019
4910/41/19 HACC AC 25/09/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 02/10/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 02/10/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 09/10/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 09/10/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 09/10/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 09/10/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 09/10/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 07/11/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 07/11/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 11/11/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 11/11/2019 Decision on temporary access
4910/41/19 HACC 03/12/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 05/12/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 05/12/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 06/12/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 06/12/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 09/12/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 09/12/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 10/12/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 10/12/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 12/12/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 12/12/2019
4910/41/19 HACC 03/01/2020
4910/41/19 HACC 03/01/2020
4910/41/19 HACC 03/01/2020
4910/41/19 HACC 03/01/2020
4910/41/19 HACC 03/01/2020
4910/41/19 HACC 03/01/2020
4910/41/19 HACC 20/01/2020
4910/41/19 HACC 21/01/2020
4910/41/19 HACC 21/01/2020
991/326/20 HACC 21/01/2020
991/326/20 HACC 21/01/2020
4910/41/19 HACC 22/01/2020
4910/41/19 HACC 23/01/2020
4910/41/19 HACC 24/01/2020
4910/41/19 HACC 24/01/2020
991/1181/20 HACC 10/02/2020
991/1181/20 HACC 10/02/2020
991/1818/20 HACC 03/03/2020 On the appointment of a preparatory court hearing
991/1818/20 HACC 03/04/2020
991/1818/20 HACC 03/04/2020
991/1818/20 HACC 13/05/2020 On the appointment of a trial
991/1818/20 HACC 13/05/2020 On the appointment of a trial
991/1818/20 HACC 12/06/2020
991/1818/20 HACC 12/06/2020
991/1818/20 HACC 16/06/2020
991/1818/20 HACC 16/06/2020
991/1818/20 HACC 13/10/2020 On changing the interim measure for the accused
991/1818/20 HACC 13/10/2020 On changing the interim measure for the accused
991/1818/20 HACC 03/12/2020
991/1818/20 HACC 08/12/2020
991/1818/20 HACC 25/03/2021
991/1818/20 HACC 12/05/2021
991/1818/20 HACC 12/05/2021
991/1818/20 HACC 08/06/2021
991/1818/20 HACC 29/06/2021
991/1818/20 HACC 02/05/2022
991/1818/20 HACC 07/06/2022 Verdicts
991/1818/20 HACC 04/08/2022