Search

The case of former Minister of Infrastructure Andrii Pyvovarskyi

  • Date of commencement of the case: 22/03/2023
  • Instance: HACC
  • Stage of criminal proceedings: Judicial proceedings
Track case progress If you would like to follow the case, leave your email and get updates sent straight to your inbox
The case of former Minister of Infrastructure Andrii Pyvovarskyi The case of former Minister of Infrastructure Andrii Pyvovarskyi

Case description

The NABU and the SAPO suspect former Minister of Infrastructure Andrii Pyvovarskyi of causing more than $40 million in losses to the state through a fraudulent collection of ship dues.

The investigation claims that in 2015, Pyvovarskyi and his former deputy Volodymyr Shulmeister issued an order allowing private companies to charge half the rate of ship dues to ships in Pivdennyi Seaport. The order was issued despite the fact that the port's water area is state property, and the right to charge fees belongs exclusively to the state-owned enterprise. Previously, at a meeting of the Tariff Council, it was determined that ship dues were to be collected exclusively for the benefit of the state enterprise USPA. However, a senior official at the Ministry of Infrastructure instructed his subordinate, the Deputy Director of the Department of Economics and Finance, to proceed with arrangements for distributing the collected dues between the state enterprise and the private companies TIS-Container Terminal LLC and TIS-Ruda LLC.

Pyvovarskyi approved amendments to the Ministry of Infrastructure's regulatory drafting plan for the second quarter of 2015, including draft amendments to the relevant order of the Ministry. Despite the absence of legal and economic justification, officials initiated and facilitated the approval of the draft order of the Ministry of Infrastructure by its structural divisions, relevant ministries, agencies, and the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. The explanatory note accompanying the draft order stated that its objectives were to “ensure free and safe access of ships to port berths,” “attract investment,” and “improve the efficiency of port facilities.”

Andrii Pyvovarskyi. Source: focus.ua
Andrii Pyvovarskyi. Source: focus.ua

At the Cabinet meeting, Pyvovarskyi, concealing the true purpose of the regulatory amendments, stated that they were necessary for “improving the current regulatory framework” and “implementing a competitive tariff policy for seaports.”

Therefore, it is presumed that officials of the Ministry of Infrastructure adopted amendments to the distribution of ship dues rates. As a result, the USPA lost a significant portion of the revenue that should have been directed to the state budget. Expert examinations identified more than $40 million in losses to the state between 2017 and 2021. 

Pyvovarskyi denied the charges, calling them manipulative and speculative. He emphasized that after 2016, when he was no longer a minister, he could not have caused any losses. He also noted that the draft order was initiated before his appointment, passed all necessary approvals, and was sent to the Cabinet of Ministers for re-approval after the changes. 

The USPA also filed a civil lawsuit seeking to recover UAH 49.3 million from the defendants and UAH 49.3 million from the TIS group of companies.

Pyvovarskyi and Shulmeister are charged with Article 364, Part 2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. 

  • Proceeding No.: 22016000000000269
  • Case No.: 991/6364/24 show all cases hide other cases
  • Other court cases No.: 991/447/19, 991/6198/20, 991/6199/20, 991/5718/21, 991/6889/21, 991/6886/21, 991/7523/21, 991/8001/21, 991/260/23, 991/259/23, 991/685/23, 991/1382/23, 991/1381/23, 991/1383/23, 991/1377/23, 991/1378/23, 991/1602/23, 991/1600/23, 991/1790/23, 991/2384/23, 991/2385/23, 991/2900/23, 991/1681/23, 991/1680/23, 991/4137/23, 991/4180/23, 991/4605/23, 991/6156/23, 991/6732/23, 991/1938/24, 991/3063/24, 991/5302/24, 991/5458/24, 991/6070/24, 991/6238/24
  • Incriminated: Article 191, part 5, Article 364, part 2
Instance Key parties Instance /Key parties:
HACC
29/07/2024

Panel of judges: Shyroka K.Yu.

Infographics

THE CASE OF ANDRII PYVOVARSKYI

Former Minister of Infrastructure Andrii Pyvovarskyi, in collusion with his deputy, allegedly ordered the illegal collection of part of the port's ship dues to private companies' accounts.

Article 364, part 2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine

  • 2015
    The defendants issued an order to collect half of the ship dues from vessels in Pivdennyi Seaport to the accounts of private companies
  • pic
    February 22, 2023
    the NABU and the SAPO served a notice of suspicion to Pyvovarskyi and his deputy Shulmeister
  • March 16, 2023
    The HACC set bail for Pivovarskyi at almost UAH 10 million
  • April 4, 2023
    The HACC set bail for Shulmeister at UAH 4 million
  • August 8, 2023
    the SAPO completed the investigation in the case
  • March 25, 2024
    The HACC Investigating Judge limited the period for the defense to review the case file until July 13, 2024
  • June 24, 2024
    Pyvovarskyi’s bail was reduced to UAH 5 million
  • July 25, 2024
    The NABU and SAPO submitted the indictment to the court
  • February 10, 2025
    The HACC scheduled a hearing on the merits of the case against former Minister of Infrastructure Pyvovarskyi

Decisions from the Register

Case No. Court Decision date Decision type
991/447/19 HACC 30/09/2019
991/447/19 HACC 30/09/2019
991/447/19 HACC 19/11/2019
991/447/19 HACC 19/11/2019
991/447/19 HACC 19/11/2019
991/447/19 HACC 20/11/2019
991/447/19 HACC 20/11/2019
991/447/19 HACC 20/11/2019
991/447/19 HACC 21/11/2019
991/447/19 HACC 21/11/2019
991/447/19 HACC 21/11/2019
991/447/19 HACC 21/11/2019
991/447/19 HACC 21/11/2019
991/447/19 HACC 21/11/2019
991/6198/20 HACC 28/07/2020
991/6199/20 HACC 28/07/2020
991/5718/21 HACC 30/08/2021
991/5718/21 HACC 31/08/2021
991/5718/21 HACC 02/09/2021
991/5718/21 HACC 02/09/2021
991/6889/21 HACC 13/10/2021
991/6886/21 HACC 13/10/2021
991/6889/21 HACC 18/10/2021
991/6886/21 HACC 18/10/2021
991/6889/21 HACC 20/10/2021
991/6886/21 HACC 21/10/2021
991/6886/21 HACC 21/10/2021
991/6889/21 HACC AC 29/10/2021
991/6889/21 HACC AC 01/11/2021
991/6889/21 HACC 03/11/2021
991/6889/21 HACC AC 03/11/2021
991/6889/21 HACC AC 03/11/2021
991/7523/21 HACC 10/11/2021
991/7523/21 HACC 11/11/2021
991/7523/21 HACC 16/11/2021
991/7523/21 HACC 16/11/2021
991/6889/21 HACC 30/11/2021
991/6889/21 HACC 30/11/2021
991/8001/21 HACC 01/12/2021
991/8001/21 HACC 06/12/2021
991/8001/21 HACC 08/12/2021
991/8001/21 HACC 08/12/2021
991/6889/21 HACC AC 10/12/2021
991/6889/21 HACC AC 14/12/2021
991/6889/21 HACC AC 14/12/2021
991/260/23 HACC 17/01/2023
991/260/23 HACC 17/01/2023
991/259/23 HACC 17/01/2023
991/259/23 HACC 17/01/2023
991/685/23 HACC 31/01/2023
991/1382/23 HACC 15/02/2023
991/1381/23 HACC 15/02/2023
991/1382/23 HACC 15/02/2023
991/1381/23 HACC 15/02/2023
991/1383/23 HACC 15/02/2023
991/1377/23 HACC 15/02/2023
991/1383/23 HACC 15/02/2023
991/1377/23 HACC 15/02/2023
991/1378/23 HACC 16/02/2023
991/1378/23 HACC 16/02/2023
991/1602/23 HACC AC 09/03/2023
991/1600/23 HACC AC 09/03/2023
991/1600/23 HACC AC 10/03/2023
991/1600/23 HACC AC 10/03/2023
991/1602/23 HACC AC 10/03/2023
991/1790/23 HACC 22/03/2023 On the imposition of an interim measure in the form of bail
991/1790/23 HACC 22/03/2023 On the imposition of an interim measure in the form of bail
991/2384/23 HACC 05/04/2023 Decision to cancel the seizure of property
991/2385/23 HACC 05/04/2023 Decision to cancel the seizure of property
991/2385/23 HACC 05/04/2023 Decision to cancel the seizure of property
991/1602/23 HACC AC 10/04/2023
991/1600/23 HACC AC 10/04/2023
991/2384/23 HACC 10/04/2023 Decision to cancel the seizure of property
991/1600/23 HACC 10/04/2023
991/1602/23 HACC 10/04/2023
991/1600/23 HACC 10/04/2023
991/1602/23 HACC 10/04/2023
991/2900/23 HACC 11/04/2023 On the imposition of an interim measure in the form of bail
991/2900/23 HACC 11/04/2023 On the imposition of an interim measure in the form of bail
991/2384/23 HACC 19/04/2023
991/1681/23 HACC AC 04/05/2023
991/1680/23 HACC AC 08/05/2023
991/1681/23 HACC AC 12/05/2023
991/1681/23 HACC AC 12/05/2023
991/1681/23 HACC AC 12/05/2023 Separate opinion of the HACC judge
991/1681/23 HACC 12/05/2023
991/1681/23 HACC 12/05/2023
991/4137/23 HACC 15/05/2023
991/4137/23 HACC 15/05/2023
991/4180/23 HACC 16/05/2023
991/4180/23 HACC 16/05/2023
991/1680/23 HACC AC 17/05/2023
991/1680/23 HACC AC 17/05/2023 Separate opinion of the HACC judge
991/1680/23 HACC AC 17/05/2023
991/1680/23 HACC 17/05/2023
991/1680/23 HACC 17/05/2023
991/4137/23 HACC 30/05/2023
991/4137/23 HACC 30/05/2023
991/4605/23 HACC 31/05/2023
991/4605/23 HACC 31/05/2023
991/4137/23 HACC AC 02/06/2023 On the return of the appeal
991/4137/23 HACC AC 06/06/2023 On the return of the appeal
991/6156/23 HACC 13/07/2023
991/6156/23 HACC 13/07/2023
991/6732/23 HACC 02/08/2023
991/6732/23 HACC 02/08/2023
991/1938/24 HACC 25/03/2024
991/1938/24 HACC 25/03/2024
991/3063/24 HACC 25/04/2024
991/3063/24 HACC 25/04/2024
991/5302/24 HACC 24/06/2024 On changing the interim measure for the accused, Decision to change the interim measure
991/5302/24 HACC 24/06/2024 On changing the interim measure for the accused, Decision to change the interim measure
991/5458/24 HACC 28/06/2024 Decision on the return of bail
991/6070/24 HACC 19/07/2024
991/6238/24 HACC 19/07/2024
991/6070/24 HACC 19/07/2024
991/6364/24 HACC 29/07/2024 On the appointment of a preparatory court hearing
991/6364/24 HACC 23/08/2024
991/6364/24 HACC 09/09/2024 On the appointment of a preparatory court hearing
991/6364/24 HACC 19/09/2024
991/6364/24 HACC 19/09/2024
991/6364/24 HACC 06/12/2024
991/6364/24 HACC 06/12/2024
991/6364/24 HACC 13/01/2025
991/6364/24 HACC 13/01/2025
991/6364/24 HACC 10/02/2025
991/6364/24 HACC 10/02/2025 On the appointment of a trial
991/6364/24 HACC 10/02/2025 On the appointment of a trial
991/6364/24 HACC 10/02/2025

YouTube broadcasts of HACC hearings

More
YouTube broadcasts of HACC hearings