Search

Embezzlement of UAH 24.5 million from the Eastern Mining and Processing Plant: the case of Ihor Holoborodko and Ihor Veduta, former SE officials

  • Date of commencement of the case: 06/08/2020
Track case progress If you would like to follow the case, leave your email and get updates sent straight to your inbox
Embezzlement of UAH 24.5 million from the Eastern Mining and Processing Plant: the case of Ihor Holoborodko and Ihor Veduta, former SE officials Embezzlement of UAH 24.5 million from the Eastern Mining and Processing Plant: the case of Ihor Holoborodko and Ihor Veduta, former SE officials

Case description

On November 2, 2022, the HACC found Ihor Holoborodko, former deputy general director of the Eastern Mining and Processing Plant, and Ihor Veduta, director of Eco-Service Trading House LLC, guilty of causing UAH 24.5 million in damages to the state-owned enterprise by criminal acts.

The Eastern Mining and Processing Plant in Zhovti Vody is engaged in the extraction and processing of uranium ore and is also a producer of sulfuric acid.

 

Between February and May 2015, the Eastern Mining and Processing Plant and Eco-Service Trading House LLC concluded a number of additional agreements to the contract for the purchase of minerals (sulfur) for the needs of the state-owned enterprise. The price of sulfur was gradually increased, and the amount of sulfur was reduced through three intermediary companies: first, the price was inflated by 31%, and then by 57%. It is estimated that the state-owned enterprise suffered losses of UAH 24.5 million.

This was explained by a sharp rise in the dollar from UAH 15 to UAH 25, but the original agreement did not mention currency fluctuations. Subsequently, the NABU succeeded in getting the court to terminate the agreements for the purchase of sulfur for the Eastern Mining and Processing Plant at inflated prices. The private company wants to repay the UAH 24.5 million. 

By the way, Ihor Veduta is Ruslan Zhurylo's close friend, who, along with former MP Martynenko, is a defendant in the case of embezzlement of EUR 6.4 million from Enerhoatom and USD 17.28 million from the Eastern Mining and Processing Plant.

Veduta and Holoborodko were hiding in the territory of the temporarily occupied Crimea, so they were put on the wanted list. The defendants were tried in absentia, and in 2020 Holoborodko was detained and arrested for 40 days in Simferopol. The Ministry of Justice did not file an extradition request, as this would have meant recognizing Russian jurisdiction over Crimea.

The court classified the actions of Holoborodko and Veduta (as an intermediary) under Article 191, part 5 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, and the latter was also charged as an intermediary. Veduta was sentenced to 9 years in prison with confiscation of property and a ban on holding certain positions for 3 years, and Holoborodko was sentenced to 8 years in prison with confiscation of property. The judges also applied special forfeiture to UAH 20.85 million that the firm received from the Eastern Mining and Processing Plant.

The appellate instance upheld the verdict. The cassation appeal is being heard.

  • Proceeding No.: 52018000000000215
  • Case No.: 991/6543/20 show all cases hide other cases
  • Other court cases No.: 910/227/19, 991/1231/20, 991/2004/20, 991/2167/20, 991/2378/20, 991/3056/20, 991/3381/20
  • Incriminated: Article 191, part 5
Instance Key parties Instance /Key parties:
CCC
18/09/2023

Panel of judges: Holubytskyi S.S.

HACC AC
22/12/2022

Panel of judges: Chorna V.V.

HACC
06/08/2020

Panel of judges: Bitsiuk A.V., Moisak S.M., Khamzin T.R., Kruk Ye.V., Kravchuk O.O., Bilous I.O.

Lawyer: Cherezovoi T.O., Tymofiieva Ye.L., Dziuby M.O.

Prosecutor: Harvanko I.M., Semak I.A.

Infographics

THE CASE OF EMBEZZLEMENT FROM THE EASTERN MINING AND PROCESSING PLANT

Ihor Holoborodko, former deputy general director of the Eastern Mining and Processing Plant, and Ihor Veduta, director of a private firm, signed contracts for the supply of sulfur to the state-owned enterprise at inflated prices. The State Enterprise suffered UAH 24.5 million in losses.

  • February–May 2015
    Holoborodko and Veduta concluded a number of additional agreements to the sulfur supply agreement for the Eastern Mining and Processing Plant, gradually increasing the cost of raw materials
  • October 2, 2019
    the NABU served Holoborodko and Veduta with suspicion notices of embezzlement of funds of the state-owned enterprise in absentia. They fled to the occupied Crimea, so they were put on the wanted list
  • December 13, 2019
    the HACC took Veduta into custody in absentia
  • December 23, 2019
    the HACC took Holoborodko into custody in absentia
  • pic
    November 2, 2022
    the HACC found Holoborodko and Veduta guilty and sentenced them in absentia to 9 and 8 years in prison, respectively, with confiscation of property
  • May 30, 2023
    the HACC Appeals Chamber upheld the verdict of the first instance

Decisions from the Register

Case No. Court Decision date Decision type
910/227/19 HACC 19/09/2019
910/227/19 HACC 19/09/2019
910/227/19 HACC 19/09/2019
910/227/19 HACC 19/09/2019
910/227/19 HACC 19/09/2019
910/227/19 HACC 24/09/2019
910/227/19 HACC 24/09/2019
910/227/19 HACC 24/09/2019
910/227/19 HACC 26/09/2019
910/227/19 HACC AC 30/09/2019 On closing appeal proceedings
910/227/19 HACC 07/10/2019
910/227/19 HACC 15/10/2019
910/227/19 HACC 22/10/2019
910/227/19 HACC 22/10/2019
910/227/19 HACC 29/10/2019
910/227/19 HACC 29/10/2019
910/227/19 HACC 03/12/2019
910/227/19 HACC 04/12/2019
910/227/19 HACC 04/12/2019
910/227/19 HACC 13/12/2019 On the imposition of an interim measure in the form of detention
910/227/19 HACC 24/12/2019 On the imposition of an interim measure in the form of detention
910/227/19 HACC 24/12/2019 On the imposition of an interim measure in the form of detention
910/227/19 HACC 28/12/2019
910/227/19 HACC 28/12/2019
910/227/19 HACC AC 22/01/2020
910/227/19 HACC AC 22/01/2020
910/227/19 HACC AC 22/01/2020
910/227/19 HACC AC 22/01/2020
991/1231/20 HACC 20/02/2020
991/1231/20 HACC 20/02/2020
991/2004/20 HACC 05/03/2020
991/2004/20 HACC 12/03/2020
991/2167/20 HACC 12/03/2020
991/2167/20 HACC 13/03/2020
991/2167/20 HACC 18/03/2020
991/2378/20 HACC 24/03/2020
991/2378/20 HACC 24/03/2020
991/3056/20 HACC 17/04/2020
991/3056/20 HACC 17/04/2020
991/3381/20 HACC 30/04/2020
991/3381/20 HACC 30/04/2020
991/6543/20 HACC 06/08/2020 On the appointment of a preparatory court hearing
991/6543/20 HACC 07/10/2020
991/6543/20 HACC 07/10/2020
991/6543/20 HACC 02/02/2021 On the enforcement of special court proceedings
991/6543/20 HACC 02/02/2021 On the enforcement of special court proceedings
991/6543/20 HACC 02/03/2021 On the appointment of a trial
991/6543/20 HACC 02/03/2021 On the appointment of a trial
991/6543/20 HACC 11/11/2021
991/6543/20 HACC 11/11/2021
991/6543/20 HACC 05/05/2022
991/6543/20 HACC 10/05/2022
991/6543/20 HACC 10/05/2022
991/6543/20 HACC 19/05/2022
991/6543/20 HACC 07/06/2022
991/6543/20 HACC 07/06/2022
991/6543/20 HACC 19/07/2022
991/6543/20 HACC 03/10/2022
991/6543/20 HACC AC 08/12/2022 On leaving the appeal without action
991/6543/20 HACC AC 22/12/2022 Opening of appeal proceedings
991/6543/20 HACC AC 24/01/2023
991/6543/20 HACC 30/05/2023 Verdicts
991/6543/20 HACC AC 30/05/2023
991/6543/20 HACC AC 30/05/2023
991/6543/20 CCC 03/08/2023 On leaving the cassation appeal without motion
991/6543/20 CCC 18/09/2023
991/6543/20 CCC 18/09/2023 On the opening of cassation proceedings
991/6543/20 HACC 06/10/2023
991/6543/20 CCC 10/11/2023 On the completion of preparation and appointment of the cassation hearing