Case of the Kyrylenko Couple: Failure to Declare Assets and Illicit Enrichment

Case of the Kyrylenko Couple: Failure to Declare Assets and Illicit Enrichment
Start of the trial 10 November 2025
Instance HACC
Stage of criminal proceedings Judicial proceedings

The NABU-SAPO accuse Pavlo Kyrylenko, head of the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine and former head of the Donetsk Regional Military Administration, of illicit enrichment exceeding UAH 72 million and failure to declare assets, and his wife, Alla Kyrylenko, of acting as an accomplice in illicit enrichment

According to the investigation, while serving as head of the Donetsk Regional State Administration, Pavlo Kyrylenko became the owner of assets whose value significantly exceeds his lawful income.

Specifically, the case concerns the following property worth over UAH 72 million:

  • 7 apartments in Kyiv and Uzhhorod with a total area of 688.5 sq.m;
  • house near Kyiv with an area of more than 220 sq.m;
  • 2 garage boxes;
  • 6 parking spaces;
  • 3 non-residential premises with a total area of more than 190 sq.m;
  • BMW X3 car;
  • 2 land plots.

However, law enforcement reports indicate that the combined official income of Pavlo Kyrylenko and his wife from 2020 to 2023 was just over UAH 4.7 million. The NABU investigation began after Radio Liberty journalists published their report in March 2024, highlighting potential illegal enrichment by the Kyrylenko family.

The head of the AMCU registered all the property under the names of his wife's parents, Oleksandr and Nataliia Matiienko. According to the prosecutor, these relatives could not have afforded to purchase these assets, which were, in fact, used by Kyrylenko himself.

According to the investigation, Pavlo Kyrylenko involved his relatives in these actions: his wife, as well as her parents and grandmother, who bought up property on his instructions. It was Alla Kyrylenko who was allegedly responsible for searching for, selecting, and acquiring the assets, as well as registering ownership in other people's names. Meanwhile, the Kyrylenko couple retained the de facto right to dispose of the properties.

For instance, Alla Kyrylenko paid a deposit for a four-room apartment with an area of 191.2 sq m and stated that she would register it in the name of another trusted person, her grandmother Albina Vinnikova.

Later, Alla Kyrylenko found a garden house with a land plot and agreed with its owner on the purchase. According to the documents, the house and plot were bought by Alla Kyrylenko's father, Oleksandr Matiienko. He later bought another adjacent land plot, and subsequently also property rights to three apartments in the Resident Park residential complex and three parking spaces.

Alla Kyrylenko's mother, Nataliia Matiienko, bought two garage boxes and a 2020 BMW X3 despite not even having a driver's license; in fact, the car was used by the official's wife herself. On the Kyrylenkos' instructions, Alla's mother also bought property rights to another apartment in the Resident Park residential complex and a parking space.

According to the investigation, Pavlo Kyrylenko involved his relatives in these actions: his wife, as well as her parents and grandmother, who bought up property on his instructions. It was Alla Kyrylenko who was allegedly responsible for searching for, selecting, and acquiring the assets, as well as registering ownership in other people's names. Meanwhile, the Kyrylenko couple retained the de facto right to dispose of the properties.

For instance, Alla Kyrylenko paid a deposit for a four-room apartment with an area of 191.2 sq m and stated that she would register it in the name of another trusted person, her grandmother Albina Vinnikova.

Later, Alla Kyrylenko found a garden house with a land plot and agreed with its owner on the purchase. According to the documents, the house and plot were bought by Alla Kyrylenko's father, Oleksandr Matiienko. He later bought another adjacent land plot, and subsequently also property rights to three apartments in the Resident Park residential complex and three parking spaces.

Alla Kyrylenko's mother, Nataliia Matiienko, bought two garage boxes and a 2020 BMW X3 despite not even having a driver's license; in fact, the car was used by the official's wife herself. On the Kyrylenkos' instructions, Alla's mother also bought property rights to another apartment in the Resident Park residential complex and a parking space.

According to the investigation, Alla Kyrylenko also found, inspected, and agreed on the terms of purchase of real estate in the Obolon Plaza residential complex (two apartments, two parking spaces, and an office), again involving her mother and grandmother in these transactions. The office, worth over UAH 11 million, was purchased in the name of the grandmother, who on the same day gifted it to her daughter, Alla’s mother.

To minimize the risk of exposure and avoid state financial monitoring, the contracts of sale indicated significantly understated prices. For example, apartments in Uzhhorod were purchased at prices undervalued by 7-8 times, while parking spaces were bought for more than 30 times less.

Thus, from January 3, 2020, to May 30, 2023, Pavlo Kyrylenko, with the assistance of his wife Alla as an accomplice, acquired movable and immovable property worth over UAH 72 million in total by registering it in the names of her parents and grandmother.

Pavlo Kyrylenko
Pavlo Kyrylenko

In addition to illicit enrichment, the head of the AMCU is suspected of inaccurate declaration: he failed to disclose the acquired property in his declarations for 2020–2024. In his 2023 declaration, Pavlo Kyrylenko disclosed only part of the property, namely the apartment where he lives, but did not declare the BMW.

Pavlo Kyrylenko's actions are classified under Article 368-5 and Article 366-2(2) of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. The actions of his wife, Alla Kyrylenko, are classified under Article 27(5) in conjunction with Article 368-5 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.

The property whose acquisition is imputed to Pavlo Kyrylenko has now been seized to secure special forfeiture.

Pavlo Kyrylenko is a lawyer by training. He worked in the prosecution service of Ukraine for 11 years. In 2019, he was appointed head of the Donetsk Regional State Administration and head of the military-civil administration, and in 2023 he became head of the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine.

Notably, on June 21, 2024, the President of Ukraine appointed Kyrylenko as a member of the delegation to participate in negotiations on Ukraine's EU accession.

Kyrylenko traveled abroad twice in 2024 in his capacity as head of the AMCU.

The case was investigated in two criminal proceedings. The first concerned Pavlo Kyrylenko's illicit enrichment and failure to declare assets in 2021–2023. The second concerned Kyrylenko's failure to declare assets in 2024 and the suspicion against Alla Kyrylenko of acting as an accomplice in her husband's illicit enrichment. The first case was sent to court in July 2025 and the second in October, but the court later decided to join the two criminal proceedings into a single case. The decision was based on the identical factual circumstances of the cases and the almost complete overlap of the witness lists.

Proceeding No. 52024000000000135
Case No. 991/7016/25
Date the indictment/claim was received by the court 07/07/2025
Date the hearing was scheduled 10/11/2025
Duration of proceedings 448 days
Subjects
  • Other
  • Head of a state or municipal enterprise/institution
Qualification
Article 366-2, part 2
Pre-trial cases №
  • 991/10993/25
  • 991/5453/25
  • 991/4171/25
  • 991/5290/25
  • 991/4172/25
  • 991/3518/25
  • 991/3016/25
  • 991/2835/25
  • 991/1974/25
  • 991/1263/25
  • 991/14115/24
  • 991/13598/24
  • 991/13208/24
  • 991/12534/24
  • 991/12535/24
  • 991/11943/24
  • 991/7665/24
  • 991/12533/24
  • 991/12071/24
  • 991/7623/24
  • 991/8146/24
  • 991/8145/24
  • 991/8144/24
  • 991/7663/24
  • 991/7664/24
  • 991/5461/24
  • 991/4968/24
  • 991/4970/24
  • 991/4967/24
  • 991/4964/24
  • 991/4965/24
  • 991/4966/24
  • 991/4969/24
  • 991/3866/24
  • 991/3955/24
  • 991/3868/24
  • 991/3867/24
  • 991/3120/24
Merged with
Instance Key parties
HACC 07/07/2025 Panel of judges: Movchan N.V.
CASE OF PAVLO KYRYLENKO
Judicial proceedings

AMCU Head Pavlo Kyrylenko allegedly illicitly enriched himself by over UAH 72 million, with the assistance of his wife Alla Kyrylenko. Kyrylenko did not disclose the acquired property in his declarations for 2020–2024.

Art. 368-5, Part 2, and Art. 366-2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine

  • pic
    November 2019
    Alla Kyrylenko, allegedly on her husband's instructions, began buying up numerous property assets
  • pic
    January 3, 2020, to May 30, 2023
    Kyrylenko, with his wife's assistance, allegedly acquired assets worth over UAH 72 million and submitted declarations containing inaccurate information
  • March 22, 2024
    the NABU began investigating the first episode concerning Kyrylenko's illicit enrichment and failure to declare assets in 2021–2023
  • pic
    August 14, 2024
    Pavlo Kyrylenko was served with a notice of suspicion
  • pic
    August 28, 2024
    the HACC set bail for Kyrylenko at over UAH 30 million and obliged him to wear an electronic monitoring bracelet
  • pic
    September 16, 2024
    the HACC Appeals Chamber upheld the preventive measure
  • November 14, 2024
    the HACC granted the NABU-SAPO motion and extended the pre-trial investigation period
  • December 9, 2024
    Pavlo Kyrylenko was served with a notice of change of suspicion, and the pre-trial investigation into the first episode was completed
  • December 9, 2024
    the NABU began investigating the episode concerning Alla Kyrylenko's role as an accomplice in illicit enrichment
  • December 12, 2024
    the HACC removed Kyrylenko's electronic monitoring bracelet
  • April 29, 2025
    the HACC set a deadline of July 4, 2025, inclusive, for the defense to review the case materials
  • May 8, 2025
    the NABU began investigating the second episode concerning Pavlo Kyrylenko's failure to declare assets for 2024 and Alla Kyrylenko's role as an accomplice in illicit enrichment
  • June 4, 2025
    the HACC reduced Pavlo Kyrylenko's bail to UAH 25 million
  • pic
    June 5, 2025
    the NABU served Pavlo Kyrylenko with a new notice of suspicion of failure to declare assets for 2024 and served Alla Kyrylenko with a notice of suspicion of acting as an accomplice in her husband's illicit enrichment
  • pic
    June 6, 2025
    the HACC imposed a preventive measure of bail in the amount of UAH 9 million on Alla Kyrylenko
  • pic
    June 12, 2025
    the HACC Appeals Chamber upheld the reduced bail for Pavlo Kyrylenko
  • pic
    July 3, 2025
    the HACC Appeals Chamber reduced Alla Kyrylenko's bail to UAH 242,000
  • July 7, 2025
    the first episode of the case against Pavlo Kyrylenko was sent to the HACC, and a preparatory hearing was scheduled
  • July 23, 2025
    the NABU completed the investigation into the second episode of the case
  • August 11, 2025
    the HACC refused to suspend Pavlo Kyrylenko from the position of AMCU head but imposed additional obligations on him to refrain from communicating with witnesses and not to leave Ukraine without the court's permission
  • August 20, 2025
    the HACC scheduled consideration on the merits of the first episode of the case
  • October 27, 2025
    the second episode of the case against the Kyrylenko couple was sent to the HACC
  • October 29, 2025
    the HACC scheduled a preparatory hearing in the second episode of the case
  • November 10, 2025
    the HACC joined the criminal proceedings against the Kyrylenkos into a single case and proceeded to consideration on the merits
  • January 19, 2026
    the HACC reduced Kyrylenko's bail to UAH 20 million
  • June 10, 2026
    the HACC found Pavlo Kyrylenko's failure to appear at a hearing unjustified and fined him UAH 6,656
  • August 3, 2026
    the HACC raised the matter of disciplinary liability before the QDCB against the Kyrylenkos' defense counsel, who had failed to notify the court of his vacation in advance

Decisions from the Register

Case No. Court Decision type
991/7016/25 HACC 22/09/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 14/09/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 14/09/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 27/08/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 27/08/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 27/08/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 19/08/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 19/08/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 12/08/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 12/08/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 10/08/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 10/08/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 07/08/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 07/08/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 07/08/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 07/08/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 03/08/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 03/08/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 30/06/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 30/06/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 30/06/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 19/06/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 19/06/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 19/06/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 19/06/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 16/06/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 16/06/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 16/06/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 16/06/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 16/06/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 16/06/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 10/06/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 10/06/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 08/06/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 08/06/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 18/05/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 18/05/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 18/05/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 18/03/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 18/03/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 18/03/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 16/02/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 16/02/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 19/01/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 19/01/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 19/01/2026
991/7016/25 HACC 01/12/2025
991/7016/25 HACC 01/12/2025
991/7016/25 HACC 01/12/2025
991/7016/25 HACC 26/11/2025
991/7016/25 HACC 26/11/2025
991/7016/25 HACC 18/11/2025
991/10993/25 HACC 29/10/2025 On the appointment of a preparatory court hearing
991/7016/25 HACC 29/09/2025
991/7016/25 HACC 29/09/2025
991/7016/25 HACC 20/08/2025
991/7016/25 HACC 20/08/2025 On the appointment of a trial
991/7016/25 HACC 20/08/2025 On the appointment of a trial
991/7016/25 HACC 20/08/2025
991/7016/25 HACC 11/08/2025
991/7016/25 HACC 11/08/2025
991/7016/25 HACC 11/08/2025
991/7016/25 HACC 11/08/2025
991/7016/25 HACC 11/08/2025
991/7016/25 HACC 11/08/2025
991/7016/25 HACC 07/08/2025
991/7016/25 HACC 07/08/2025
991/7016/25 HACC 07/07/2025 On the appointment of a preparatory court hearing
991/5453/25 HACC AC 03/07/2025 Decision on partial granting of appeals
991/4171/25 HACC AC 12/06/2025
991/4171/25 HACC AC 12/06/2025
991/5290/25 HACC 05/06/2025
991/4171/25 HACC 04/06/2025
991/4171/25 HACC 04/06/2025
991/4172/25 HACC 14/05/2025
991/3518/25 HACC 29/04/2025
991/3518/25 HACC 29/04/2025
991/3016/25 HACC 09/04/2025
991/2835/25 HACC 07/04/2025
991/1974/25 HACC 19/03/2025
991/1263/25 HACC 14/02/2025
991/14115/24 HACC 23/12/2024
991/14115/24 HACC 23/12/2024
991/13598/24 HACC AC 17/12/2024
991/13598/24 HACC 12/12/2024
991/13598/24 HACC 12/12/2024
991/13208/24 HACC 29/11/2024
991/12534/24 HACC 20/11/2024
991/12535/24 HACC 20/11/2024
991/12534/24 HACC 20/11/2024
991/12535/24 HACC 20/11/2024
991/11943/24 HACC AC 07/11/2024
991/7665/24 HACC AC 07/11/2024
991/7665/24 HACC AC 07/11/2024
991/11943/24 HACC AC 07/11/2024
991/12533/24 HACC 06/11/2024
991/12071/24 HACC 25/10/2024
991/12071/24 HACC 25/10/2024
991/11943/24 HACC 17/10/2024
991/7623/24 HACC AC 16/09/2024
991/7623/24 HACC AC 16/09/2024
991/8146/24 HACC 05/09/2024
991/8145/24 HACC 05/09/2024
991/8145/24 HACC 05/09/2024
991/8144/24 HACC 05/09/2024
991/8144/24 HACC 05/09/2024
991/8146/24 HACC 05/09/2024
991/7623/24 HACC 28/08/2024
991/7623/24 HACC 28/08/2024
991/7663/24 HACC 27/08/2024
991/7664/24 HACC 27/08/2024
991/7663/24 HACC 27/08/2024
991/7664/24 HACC 27/08/2024
991/5461/24 HACC 03/07/2024
991/4968/24 HACC 24/06/2024
991/4970/24 HACC 24/06/2024
991/4970/24 HACC 24/06/2024
991/4968/24 HACC 24/06/2024
991/4967/24 HACC 24/06/2024
991/4967/24 HACC 24/06/2024
991/4964/24 HACC 24/06/2024
991/4964/24 HACC 24/06/2024
991/4965/24 HACC 24/06/2024
991/4966/24 HACC 24/06/2024
991/4965/24 HACC 24/06/2024
991/4966/24 HACC 24/06/2024
991/4969/24 HACC 24/06/2024
991/4969/24 HACC 24/06/2024
991/3866/24 HACC 18/06/2024
991/3955/24 HACC 10/05/2024
991/3868/24 HACC 10/05/2024
991/3867/24 HACC 10/05/2024
991/3866/24 HACC 10/05/2024
991/3120/24 HACC 16/04/2024

Video streams

28 August 2025

Case news