More than USD 1 million in damages: the case of fraud by Andrii Rachkov, former deputy head of the Titanium Institute

More than USD 1 million in damages: the case of fraud by Andrii Rachkov, former deputy head of the Titanium Institute
Start of the trial 6 September 2019
Date of verdict 25 April 2022
Instance HACC AC
Stage of criminal proceedings Appeal proceedings

The HACC found Andrii Rachkov, former Deputy Director General of the Titanium Institute, guilty of embezzling funds of the Institute. He was sentenced in absentia to 10 years in prison. The HACC Appeals Chamber subsequently reduced the sentence to 9 years.

According to the investigation, in 2012–2013 Rachkov transferred USD 1.258 million as remuneration to the offshore company REMAX LTD for “agency services” related to organizing documentation. In fact, no services were provided or performed.

The Titanium institute
The Titanium institute

The State Scientific Research and Design Institute of Titanium is a strategic research-and-production institution owned by the state. In May 2011, Andrii Rachkov was appointed First Deputy Director General of the Titanium Institute.

The Titanium Institute entered into a USD 13.6 million contract with Solway Industries LTD to develop the detailed design for the reconstruction of a ferronickel production plant. Preparation of the contract took several years and was carried out without any intermediaries—exclusively by the Institute and the customer company.

Despite this, according to the investigation, Rachkov implemented a scheme to siphon the enterprise’s funds. He entered into an agency agreement with REMAX LTD, which formally was to provide intermediary and consulting services under the contract with Solway Industries. In reality, the company played no role in either concluding or performing the contract.

Despite the absence of any actual services, Rachkov signed an addendum to the agency agreement providing for payment to REMAX LTD in the amount of USD 2.04 million—up to 15% of the value of the principal contract. He then prepared a series of acceptance certificates for “completed works” that were not in fact performed and submitted these documents to the finance department for payment.

During 2013, USD 1.258 million was transferred to REMAX LTD’s accounts, which at the National Bank of Ukraine exchange rate amounted to more than UAH 10 million. The funds were subsequently routed to accounts belonging to third parties. Employees of the enterprise’s finance department executed the payments without knowledge of the management’s criminal intent.

The court classified Rachkov’s actions under Article 191(5) of the Criminal Code of Ukraine and imposed a sentence of 10 years’ imprisonment, with confiscation of all property and disqualification from holding certain positions for three years. The court also granted a civil claim and ordered recovery of UAH 10 million from Rachkov in favor of the Titanium Institute.

The HACC Court of Appeal upheld the verdict. However, the Supreme Court ordered a renewed appellate review.

Following the renewed review, the HACC Appeals Chamber found that the original formulation of the charge mischaracterized the legal classification of the offense, because misappropriation of another’s property through abuse of office constitutes an offense regardless of whether the official acted for personal benefit or for the benefit of third parties. Accordingly, in the Appeals Chamber’s view, the defendant’s actions were to be classified under Article 191(5) of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, i.e., as misappropriation on an especially large scale. In other words, the judgment was amended specifically with respect to the legal classification. The court noted that more than two years had passed since the original judgment and that Rachkov had not committed any unlawful acts during that period. The Appeals Chamber therefore reduced the sentence from ten to nine years’ imprisonment.

The case was tried in absentia. In December 2021, Rachkov left Ukraine and did not return; in January of the following year, he was placed on the international wanted list.

In addition, HACC found Vladímir Mokson, an accomplice in this case, guilty and sentenced him to eight years’ imprisonment.

Proceeding No. 32014080000000003
Case No. 4910/10/19-к
Date the hearing was scheduled 11/09/2019
Subject
  • Head of a state or municipal enterprise/institution
Qualification
Article 191, part 5, Article 364, part 2
Pre-trial cases №
  • 760/22283/19
  • 760/21329/19
Instance Key parties
HACC AC 30/05/2022 Panel of judges: Pankulych V.I.
HACC 06/09/2019 Panel of judges: Kruk Ye.V., Bilous I.O., Kravchuk O.O.
THE CASE OF ANDRII RACHKOV
Appeal proceedings

Former Deputy Director General of the Titanium Institute Andrii Rachkov unlawfully misappropriated the Institute’s funds by transferring them to an offshore company for fictitious services.

  • 2012–2013
    Rachkov paid USD 1.2 million to an offshore company for services that were never provided.
  • pic
    July 22, 2019
    the NABU detained Rachkov and served him with a suspicion notice
  • July 29, 2019
    the court seized Rachkov's business
  • December 23, 2021
    Rachkov left Ukraine for Turkey and did not return
  • January 3, 2020
    the HACC released Rachkov on UAH 525,500 bail
  • January 12-13, 2022
    the HACC arrested Rachkov in absentia and put him on the international wanted list, as well as recovered the bail he had previously paid due to his escape
  • pic
    April 20, 2022
    the HACC found Rachkov guilty and sentenced him in absentia to 10 years with additional penalties
  • September 22, 2022
    The HACC Appeals Chamber left the judgment unchanged
  • May 21, 2023
    The Criminal Cassation Court of the Supreme Court remanded the case for renewed appellate review
  • September 19, 2024
    The HACC Appeals Chamber reduced the sentence from 10 to 9 years’ imprisonment
  • April 8, 2025
    The Criminal Cassation Court of the Supreme Court left the judgment and the Appeals Chamber’s ruling unchanged

Decisions from the Register

Case No. Court Decision date Decision type
4910/10/19-к HACC 06/09/2019 On the appointment of a preparatory court hearing
4910/10/19-к HACC AC 10/09/2019
4910/10/19-к HACC 11/09/2019
4910/10/19-к HACC AC 12/09/2019
4910/10/19-к HACC AC 12/09/2019
760/22283/19 HACC AC 16/09/2019
4910/10/19-к HACC 17/09/2019 Decision on the refusal/granting of the motion for the return of the indictment
4910/10/19-к HACC 18/09/2019 On the appointment of a trial
4910/10/19-к HACC AC 20/09/2019 On the refusal to open appeal proceedings
760/22283/19 HACC AC 30/09/2019 On closing appeal proceedings
760/22283/19 HACC AC 30/09/2019 On closing appeal proceedings
760/21329/19 HACC AC 24/10/2019 On closing appeal proceedings
4910/10/19-к HACC 01/11/2019
4910/10/19-к HACC AC 12/11/2019 On the refusal to open appeal proceedings
4910/10/19-к HACC 03/01/2020 On the imposition of an interim measure in the form of bail
4910/10/19-к HACC 03/01/2020 On the imposition of an interim measure in the form of bail
4910/10/19-к HACC AC 13/01/2020 On the refusal to open appeal proceedings
4910/10/19-к HACC 15/01/2020
4910/10/19-к HACC 15/01/2020
4910/10/19-к HACC 20/01/2020
4910/10/19-к HACC 24/02/2020
4910/10/19-к HACC 24/02/2020
4910/10/19-к HACC 09/04/2020 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
4910/10/19-к HACC 29/04/2020
4910/10/19-к HACC 04/05/2020
4910/10/19-к HACC 04/05/2020
4910/10/19-к HACC 04/05/2020
4910/10/19-к HACC 04/05/2020
4910/10/19-к HACC 02/06/2021 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
4910/10/19-к HACC 08/06/2021
4910/10/19-к HACC 08/06/2021
4910/10/19-к HACC 13/07/2021
4910/10/19-к HACC 13/07/2021
4910/10/19-к HACC 09/08/2021
4910/10/19-к HACC 09/08/2021
4910/10/19-к HACC 30/08/2021
4910/10/19-к HACC 30/08/2021
4910/10/19-к HACC 01/10/2021
4910/10/19-к HACC 01/10/2021
4910/10/19-к HACC 02/11/2021
4910/10/19-к HACC 02/11/2021
4910/10/19-к HACC 09/11/2021
4910/10/19-к HACC 09/11/2021
4910/10/19-к HACC 09/11/2021
4910/10/19-к HACC 09/11/2021
4910/10/19-к HACC 23/11/2021
4910/10/19-к HACC 23/11/2021
4910/10/19-к HACC 10/12/2021
4910/10/19-к HACC 10/12/2021
4910/10/19-к HACC 11/01/2022
4910/10/19-к HACC 11/01/2022 Decision on the consideration of a recusal
4910/10/19-к HACC 11/01/2022
4910/10/19-к HACC 11/01/2022 Decision on the consideration of a recusal
4910/10/19-к HACC 12/01/2022
4910/10/19-к HACC 12/01/2022
4910/10/19-к HACC 12/01/2022
4910/10/19-к HACC 12/01/2022
4910/10/19-к HACC 13/01/2022 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
4910/10/19-к HACC 13/01/2022 On the imposition of an interim measure in the form of detention
4910/10/19-к HACC 13/01/2022 On the imposition of an interim measure in the form of detention
4910/10/19-к HACC 18/01/2022 On the enforcement of special court proceedings
4910/10/19-к HACC 18/01/2022 On the enforcement of special court proceedings
4910/10/19-к HACC 25/01/2022
4910/10/19-к HACC 25/01/2022
4910/10/19-к HACC AC 25/01/2022 On the refusal to open appeal proceedings
4910/10/19-к HACC 21/02/2022 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
4910/10/19-к HACC 30/03/2022 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
4910/10/19-к HACC 20/04/2022 Verdicts, Decision to cancel the seizure of property
4910/10/19-к HACC AC 30/05/2022 Opening of appeal proceedings
4910/10/19-к HACC AC 09/06/2022 Completion of the preparation and appointment of the appeal hearing
4910/10/19-к HACC AC 22/09/2022 On non-granting of the appeal and leaving the verdict unchanged
4910/10/19-к HACC AC 22/09/2022 On non-granting of the appeal and leaving the verdict unchanged
4910/10/19-к HACC 30/05/2023
4910/10/19-к HACC 30/05/2023
4910/10/19-к HACC 30/05/2023
4910/10/19-к HACC 29/06/2023
4910/10/19-к HACC 29/06/2023
4910/10/19-к HACC 29/06/2023
4910/10/19-к HACC 29/06/2023
4910/10/19-к HACC 29/06/2023
4910/10/19-к HACC AC 19/06/2024
4910/10/19-к HACC AC 19/09/2024 Decision on partial granting of appeals, On partial granting of the appeal and change of the verdict
4910/10/19-к HACC AC 19/09/2024 On partial granting of the appeal and change of the verdict, Decision on partial granting of appeals