Search

Case of ex-director of Kherson CHPP Bohdan Pedchenko

  • Date of commencement of the case: 02/10/2019
Track case progress If you would like to follow the case, leave your email and get updates sent straight to your inbox
Case of ex-director of Kherson CHPP Bohdan Pedchenko Case of ex-director of Kherson CHPP Bohdan Pedchenko

Case description

On July 7, 2020, the HACC found Bohdan Pedchenko, ex-Chair of the Board of Kherson CHPP, guilty of providing an illegal loan to another LLC and causing losses to the CHPP. He was imprisoned for 5 years and fined UAH 17,000, with a ban on holding certain positions for 3 years.

 

PJSC Kherson CHPP at that time had 99.8% of the state share in the authorized capital. This means that such a company could spend no more than 1% of the net profit on charitable, sponsored, and other assistance (including loans) based on the results of the previous reporting year, but on condition of the approval of the annual financial plan of PJSC Kherson CHPP for the next year. If the amount is higher, this must be additionally agreed upon with the relevant authorities. 

According to the results of 2014, the net profit of Kherson CHPP amounted to UAH 15,629,000, of which 1% amounted to more than UAH 156,000. Given this and the fact that as of 2015, the CHPP had significant debts, and its financial plan for 2015 was not approved, Pedchenko independently decided to provide an interest-free loan to LLC Quadro-Finance.

 

This loan amounted to more than UAH 8 mln, with a full repayment period of 7 months. Later, he concluded an agreement with this LLC, which unreasonably extended the loan repayment period for another year. 

LLC Quadro-Finance did not return this money within the specified period, and Kherson CHPP suffered significant property damage. 

The crime was qualified under Art. 364, part 2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. The court regarded the execution of such an agreement as a means of providing a bribe. Pedchenko was sentenced to 5 years in prison, fined UAH 17,000, and deprived of the right to hold certain positions for 3 years. The court refused to compensate the State Property Fund for damages at the expense of Pedchenko.

In court, Pedchenko pleaded not guilty because he allegedly had acted solely in the interests of the CHPP, which, in his opinion, was not a state-owned enterprise.

The defense of Pedchenko and the SPFU filed appeals, which were dismissed. The defense also asked to postpone the execution of the sentence for six months because Pedchenko allegedly suffered from a serious illness, but the court rejected this. Subsequently, the HACC Appeals Chamber and the Supreme Court left the verdict unchanged.

 

  • Proceeding No.: 52016000000000135
  • Case No.: 766/16775/17
  • Incriminated: Article 191, part 5, Article 364, part 2, Article 209, part 2
Instance Key parties Instance /Key parties:
HACC AC
14/08/2020

Panel of judges: Chorna V.V., Kaluhina I.O., Nykyforov A.S., Pavlyshyn O.F., Mykhailenko D.H., Semennykov O.Yu.

Lawyer: Pasichnichenka O.P., Huberskoho A.S., Kniazskoi N.A.

Prosecutor: Musiiaka V.V.

HACC
02/10/2019

Panel of judges: Kryklyvyi V.V., Halabala M.V., Nohachevskyi V.V.

Lawyer: Pasichnichenka O.P., Huberskoho A.S.

Prosecutor: Musiiaka V.V.

Infographics

CASE OF BOHDAN PEDCHENKO

Bohdan Pedchenko, ex-Head of the Board of Kherson CHPP, caused more than UAH 8 mln losses for the CHPP by providing an illegal loan to another enterprise. The court regarded this as a bribe.

  • On September 19, 2019
    Kherson City Court transferred the proceedings against Pedchenko to the HACC
  • pic
    On July 7, 2020
    the HACC found Pedchenko guilty, sentenced him to 5 years in prison, fined him UAH 17,000, and banned him from holding certain positions for 3 years
  • On March 15, 2021
    the HACC Appeals Chamber rejected the appeals of the SPFU and the defense, and the HACC verdict remained unchanged
  • On March 25, 2021
    Pedchenko was put on the wanted list
  • On December 13, 2021
    the Supreme Court upheld the verdict against Pedchenko

Decisions from the Register

Case No. Court Decision date Decision type
766/16775/17 HACC 02/10/2019 On the appointment of a preparatory court hearing
766/16775/17 CCC 15/10/2019
766/16775/17 HACC 05/11/2019
766/16775/17 HACC 05/11/2019
766/16775/17 HACC 05/11/2019
766/16775/17 HACC 12/11/2019
766/16775/17 HACC 28/11/2019
766/16775/17 HACC 14/01/2020
766/16775/17 HACC 14/01/2020
766/16775/17 HACC 15/01/2020
766/16775/17 HACC 15/01/2020
766/16775/17 HACC 21/01/2020
766/16775/17 HACC 25/02/2020
766/16775/17 HACC 25/02/2020
766/16775/17 HACC 25/02/2020
766/16775/17 HACC 25/02/2020
766/16775/17 HACC 29/04/2020
766/16775/17 HACC 22/05/2020
766/16775/17 HACC 27/05/2020
766/16775/17 HACC 01/06/2020
766/16775/17 HACC 01/06/2020
766/16775/17 HACC 02/06/2020
766/16775/17 HACC 02/06/2020
766/16775/17 HACC 24/06/2020
766/16775/17 HACC 07/07/2020 Verdicts
766/16775/17 HACC AC 14/08/2020 Opening of appeal proceedings
766/16775/17 HACC AC 14/08/2020 On leaving the appeal without action
766/16775/17 HACC AC 09/09/2020 Opening of appeal proceedings
766/16775/17 HACC AC 21/09/2020 Completion of the preparation and appointment of the appeal hearing
766/16775/17 HACC AC 15/03/2021
766/16775/17 HACC AC 15/03/2021
766/16775/17 HACC AC 25/05/2021
766/16775/17 CCC 31/08/2021 On the completion of preparation and appointment of the cassation hearing
766/16775/17 CCC 13/12/2021 Resolution to leave the verdict and the AC decision unchanged and not grant the cassation appeal
766/16775/17 CCC 13/12/2021 Resolution to leave the verdict and the AC decision unchanged and not grant the cassation appeal