Search

UAH 2.5 million in losses of the Berdiansk port: the case of Oleksandr Barchan, former port director, and defendant Nataliia Panchenko

  • Date of commencement of the case: 10/08/2020
Track case progress If you would like to follow the case, leave your email and get updates sent straight to your inbox
UAH 2.5 million in losses of the Berdiansk port: the case of Oleksandr Barchan, former port director, and defendant Nataliia Panchenko UAH 2.5 million in losses of the Berdiansk port: the case of Oleksandr Barchan, former port director, and defendant Nataliia Panchenko

Case description

The HACC acquitted Oleksandr Barchan, the former head of the Berdiansk port, who was accused of abuse during the purchase of a crane for almost UAH 2.5 million. The ex-head of the company that supplied the equipment was exempted from punishment because the statute of limitations had expired.

In 2018–2019, Oleksandr Barchan headed the Berdiansk branch of the State Enterprise Ukrainian Sea Ports Authority. Then the port of Berdiansk held a tender for the purchase of a crane. The winner was Kharkiv-based Elektropivdenmontazh, headed by Nataliia Panchenko, the other defendant in the case. It was alleged that the proposal did not meet all the requirements of the tender, but despite this, the company received almost UAH 2.5 million.

The defendants drew up official documents on the receipt of the said crane, which was never delivered to the port of Berdiansk. As a result of the scheme, the state suffered losses of almost UAH 2.5 million. However, after the proceedings were initiated, the procurement contract was terminated and the money paid was returned. 

Barchan's actions were classified under Article 28, part 2; Article 364, part 2; Article 366, part 1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, and Panchenko's actions under Article 27, part 5; Article 28, part 2; Article 364, part 2; Article 366, part 1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.

The HACC acquitted Barchan of all charges, and Panchenko only under Article 27, part 5; Article 28, part 2; Article 364, part 2 of the Criminal Code, and sentenced her to a year in prison, but she was released after the term expired.

Two more suspects in the case concluded a plea agreement with the investigation, namely Vitalii Burian, former deputy head of the Berdiansk port, and Oleksandr Dzhembri, port engineer. The proceedings against Burian were later closed due to a violation of the pre-trial investigation deadlines.

  • Proceeding No.: 52019000000000120
  • Case No.: 991/6646/20 show all cases hide other cases
  • Other court cases No.: 4910/54/19, 991/1307/20, 991/1308/20, 991/1309/20, 991/1310/20, 991/1574/20, 991/1573/20, 991/1575/20, 991/1576/20, 991/1770/20, 991/3065/20, 991/3064/20, 991/3310/20, 991/3350/20, 991/4697/20, 991/4696/20, 991/4820/20, 991/5049/20, 991/5482/20, 991/5798/20, 991/6384/20
  • Incriminated: Article 364, part 2
Instance Key parties Instance /Key parties:
HACC AC
22/12/2022

Panel of judges: Kaluhina I.O.

HACC
10/08/2020

Panel of judges: Voronko V.D., Moisak S.M., Bitsiuk A.V., Kravchuk O.O., Kruk Ye.V., Bilous I.O., Bitsiuk A.V.

Lawyer: Marfina V.V., Kostina M.K., Shokota A.S., Maliuk O.O., Sydorchuk Yu.M.

Prosecutor: Ponomarenko V.P., Vysotska N.V.

Infographics

THE CASE OF OLEKSANDR BARCHAN, FORMER PORT DIRECTOR, AND DEFENDANT NATALIIA PANCHENKO

Oleksandr Barchan, the former head of the Berdiansk port, was acquitted of charges of violations in the procurement of a crane. The accomplice was convicted but exempted from punishment due to the statute of limitations.

  • March 27, 2019
    the NABU conducted searches in the Berdiansk port
  • pic
    February 19, 2020
    the NABU served Barchan with a suspicion notice and detained three more people involved in the corruption scheme at the port
  • February 21, 2020
    the HACC took Panchenko into custody with an alternative of UAH 609,000 bail. The same interim measure was imposed on Barchan, but with UAH 295,000 bail
  • August 6, 2021
    the Ministry of Infrastructure terminated the powers of Barchan, Director of the Berdiansk Port
  • pic
    November 11, 2022
    the HACC acquitted Barchan, but found Panchenko, the head of Elektropivdenmontazh, guilty and exempted her from punishment due to the expiration of the statute of limitations
  • December 22, 2022
    the Kyiv Court of Appeal denied Barchan's request for reinstatement

Decisions from the Register

Case No. Court Decision date Decision type
4910/54/19 HACC 13/09/2019
4910/54/19 HACC 13/09/2019
4910/54/19 HACC 16/09/2019
4910/54/19 HACC 30/09/2019
4910/54/19 HACC 30/09/2019
4910/54/19 HACC 30/09/2019
991/1307/20 HACC 12/02/2020
991/1308/20 HACC 12/02/2020
991/1309/20 HACC 12/02/2020
991/1310/20 HACC 12/02/2020
991/1309/20 HACC 12/02/2020
991/1308/20 HACC 12/02/2020
991/1307/20 HACC 12/02/2020
991/1310/20 HACC 12/02/2020
991/1574/20 HACC 21/02/2020 On the imposition of an interim measure in the form of detention
991/1573/20 HACC 21/02/2020
991/1575/20 HACC 21/02/2020
991/1574/20 HACC 21/02/2020 On the imposition of an interim measure in the form of detention
991/1576/20 HACC 21/02/2020
991/1576/20 HACC 21/02/2020
991/1573/20 HACC 21/02/2020
991/1575/20 HACC 21/02/2020
991/1770/20 HACC 27/02/2020
991/1770/20 HACC 27/02/2020
991/1576/20 HACC AC 04/03/2020
991/1576/20 HACC AC 04/03/2020
991/1574/20 HACC AC 11/03/2020 On the imposition of an interim measure in the form of detention
991/1574/20 HACC AC 11/03/2020 On the imposition of an interim measure in the form of detention
991/1770/20 HACC AC 07/04/2020
991/1770/20 HACC AC 07/04/2020
991/3065/20 HACC 16/04/2020
991/3065/20 HACC 16/04/2020
991/3064/20 HACC 17/04/2020
991/3064/20 HACC 17/04/2020
991/3310/20 HACC 24/04/2020
991/3310/20 HACC 24/04/2020
991/3310/20 HACC 24/04/2020
991/3350/20 HACC 27/04/2020
991/3350/20 HACC 29/04/2020
991/3350/20 HACC 30/04/2020
991/3350/20 HACC 30/04/2020
991/3350/20 HACC AC 29/05/2020
991/3350/20 HACC AC 29/05/2020
991/4697/20 HACC 11/06/2020
991/4696/20 HACC 11/06/2020
991/4697/20 HACC 11/06/2020
991/4696/20 HACC 11/06/2020
991/4820/20 HACC 16/06/2020
991/4820/20 HACC 16/06/2020
991/5049/20 HACC 23/06/2020
991/5049/20 HACC 23/06/2020
991/5482/20 HACC 06/07/2020
991/5482/20 HACC 09/07/2020
991/5482/20 HACC 09/07/2020
991/5798/20 HACC 14/07/2020
991/5798/20 HACC 17/07/2020
991/5798/20 HACC 17/07/2020
991/5049/20 HACC AC 28/07/2020
991/5482/20 HACC AC 28/07/2020
991/5049/20 HACC AC 28/07/2020
991/5482/20 HACC AC 28/07/2020
991/6384/20 HACC 30/07/2020
991/6384/20 HACC 30/07/2020
991/6646/20 HACC 10/08/2020 On the appointment of a preparatory court hearing
991/6646/20 HACC 08/09/2020
991/6646/20 HACC 08/09/2020
991/6646/20 HACC 08/09/2020
991/6646/20 HACC 08/09/2020
991/6646/20 HACC 25/09/2020
991/6646/20 HACC 25/09/2020
991/6646/20 HACC 25/09/2020
991/6646/20 HACC 25/09/2020
991/6646/20 HACC 21/12/2020
991/6646/20 HACC 21/12/2020
991/6646/20 HACC 21/12/2020
991/6646/20 HACC 21/12/2020
991/6646/20 HACC 15/01/2021 On the appointment of a trial
991/6646/20 HACC 15/01/2021
991/6646/20 HACC 15/01/2021
991/6646/20 HACC 15/01/2021 On the appointment of a trial
991/6646/20 HACC 23/04/2021
991/6646/20 HACC 12/05/2021
991/6646/20 HACC 12/05/2021
991/6646/20 HACC 31/05/2021
991/6646/20 HACC 18/10/2021
991/6646/20 HACC 25/10/2021
991/6646/20 HACC 25/10/2021
991/6646/20 HACC 28/10/2021
991/6646/20 HACC 21/01/2022
991/6646/20 HACC 11/03/2022
991/6646/20 HACC 11/03/2022 Decision to change the interim measure, On changing the interim measure for the accused
991/6646/20 HACC 26/04/2022
991/6646/20 HACC 27/04/2022
991/6646/20 HACC 27/04/2022
991/6646/20 HACC 28/09/2022
991/6646/20 HACC 28/09/2022
991/6646/20 HACC 11/11/2022 Verdicts
991/6646/20 HACC AC 22/12/2022 On the refusal to open appeal proceedings, Opening of appeal proceedings
991/6646/20 HACC AC 02/01/2023 Completion of the preparation and appointment of the appeal hearing
991/6646/20 HACC AC 04/03/2024 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
991/6646/20 HACC AC 15/05/2024