The Case of Donetsk Region Judge Hennadii Moliboha and Lawyer Sierikov

The Case of Donetsk Region Judge Hennadii Moliboha and Lawyer Sierikov
Start of the trial 4 November 2019
Date of verdict 2 December 2025
Instance HACC AC
Stage of criminal proceedings Appeal proceedings

The HACC found Judge Hennadii Moliboha and lawyer Ihor Sierikov guilty of receiving an improper benefit in exchange for issuing a ruling not to bring an individual to administrative liability.

According to the investigation, Moliboha — head of the Druzhkivka City Court — used his official position to organize the receipt of an improper benefit in exchange for rulings in cases involving administrative offenses linked to the unlawful sale of tobacco products.

Hennadii Moliboha. Photo credit: HCJ
Hennadii Moliboha. Photo credit: HCJ

The scheme involved not active conduct but rather "non-intervention": for a fee, the judge promised not to hold individuals liable, not to apply confiscation of seized goods, and effectively to ensure that the products would be returned.

In the first episode, after an administrative report was drawn up, the case was assigned to Judge Moliboha. The defendant approached lawyer Sierikov, who acted as intermediary.

Under the agreed terms, money was to be paid to resolve the matter. The individual handed UAH 5,000 to the lawyer, of which UAH 3,000 was passed on to the judge. The client was then informed that he need not appear in court and that the case would be closed without adverse consequences — including the return of the seized goods.

The same scheme played out in the second episode. After the case was assigned to the same judge, the individual again approached the same lawyer. UAH 8,000 was paid, of which the lawyer passed UAH 4,000 to the judge as a bribe. In exchange, the judge was to refrain from holding the individual liable and from applying confiscation.

In this manner, Moliboha twice received an improper benefit for refraining from procedural action by abusing his authority, while lawyer Sierikov acted as intermediary between the judge and individuals seeking favorable case outcomes.

The defendants' actions were charged under Article 368(3) of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Moliboha was sentenced to six years' imprisonment with a three-year ban on holding certain positions and confiscation of half of his property.

The HACC had previously convicted Moliboha in another case involving the extortion and receipt of a bribe. Taking the cumulative offenses into account, the court imposed a final sentence of seven years and six months' imprisonment, a three-year ban on holding positions in state authorities and local self-government bodies, and confiscation of his property.

Sierikov was sentenced to four years and six months' imprisonment without confiscation of property. Pending the verdict's entry into force, he was placed under bail in the amount of UAH 9,800.

Appellate proceedings are ongoing.

Proceeding No. 52017000000000824
Case No. 760/20466/18
Date the hearing was scheduled 04/11/2019
Subjects
  • Judge
  • Lawyer
Qualification
Article 368, part 3, Article 369, part 3
Merged with
Instance Key parties
HACC AC 08/01/2026 Panel of judges: Mykhailenko D.H.
HACC 04/11/2019 Panel of judges: Kravchuk O.O.
The Case of Hennadii Moliboha
Appeal proceedings

According to the investigation, Judge Hennadii Moliboha and lawyer Ihor Sierikov received an improper benefit on at least two occasions in exchange for not bringing individuals to administrative liability.

Article 368(3) of the Criminal Code of Ukraine

 

  • pic
    October – December 2017
    Defendants allegedly received the improper benefit
  • March 23, 2018 P
    Pre-trial investigation began
  • pic
    December 15, 2017
    Notices of suspicion served on the defendants
  • pic
    December 16, 2017
    Moliboha remanded in custody with bail set at UAH 123,300; Sierikov placed under house arrest
  • December 29, 2017
    Moliboha suspended from his position
  • pic
    June 13, 2018
    Sierikov placed under personal recognizance as an interim measure
  • pic
    October 25, 2019
    Case materials received by HACC
  • November 4, 2019
    Preliminary hearing scheduled
  • February 26, 2020
    Case scheduled for trial
  • pic
    December 2, 2025
    The HACC found the defendants guilty
  • January 8, 2026
    Appellate proceedings opened

Decisions from the Register

Case No. Court Decision type
760/20466/18 HACC AC 07/07/2026
760/20466/18 HACC AC 07/07/2026
760/20466/18 HACC AC 27/05/2026
760/20466/18 HACC AC 27/05/2026
760/20466/18 HACC AC 27/05/2026
760/20466/18 HACC AC 27/05/2026
760/20466/18 HACC AC 30/04/2026
760/20466/18 HACC AC 30/04/2026
760/20466/18 HACC AC 30/03/2026
760/20466/18 HACC AC 30/03/2026
760/20466/18 HACC AC 13/03/2026
760/20466/18 HACC AC 13/03/2026
760/20466/18 HACC AC 11/02/2026
760/20466/18 HACC AC 11/02/2026
760/20466/18 HACC AC 19/01/2026 Completion of the preparation and appointment of the appeal hearing
760/20466/18 HACC AC 08/01/2026 Opening of appeal proceedings
760/20466/18 HACC 02/12/2025 Verdicts
760/20466/18 HACC 06/03/2025
760/20466/18 HACC 06/03/2025
760/20466/18 HACC 13/11/2024
760/20466/18 HACC 18/10/2023
760/20466/18 HACC 18/10/2023
760/20466/18 HACC 18/10/2023 Decision on temporary access
760/20466/18 HACC 18/10/2023
760/20466/18 HACC 14/04/2023
760/20466/18 HACC 14/04/2023
760/20466/18 HACC 18/02/2022
760/20466/18 HACC 11/11/2021
760/20466/18 HACC 11/11/2021
760/20466/18 HACC 15/06/2021
760/20466/18 HACC 15/06/2021
760/20466/18 HACC 31/03/2021
760/20466/18 HACC 31/03/2021
760/20466/18 HACC 18/02/2021
760/20466/18 HACC 18/02/2021 Decision on temporary access
760/20466/18 HACC 18/02/2021
760/20466/18 HACC 18/02/2021 Decision on temporary access
760/20466/18 HACC 17/02/2021 Decision on temporary access
760/20466/18 HACC 17/02/2021 Decision on temporary access
760/20466/18 HACC 17/02/2021 Decision on temporary access
760/20466/18 HACC 17/02/2021 Decision on temporary access
760/20466/18 HACC 17/02/2021 Decision on temporary access
760/20466/18 HACC 17/02/2021 Decision on temporary access
760/20466/18 HACC 29/01/2021 Decision on temporary access
760/20466/18 HACC 29/01/2021 Decision on temporary access
760/20466/18 HACC 29/01/2021 Decision on temporary access
760/20466/18 HACC 29/01/2021 Decision on temporary access
760/20466/18 HACC 29/01/2021 Decision on temporary access
760/20466/18 HACC 29/01/2021 Decision on temporary access
760/20466/18 HACC 12/11/2020
760/20466/18 HACC 06/08/2020
760/20466/18 HACC 31/07/2020
760/20466/18 HACC 31/07/2020
760/20466/18 HACC 18/06/2020
760/20466/18 HACC 27/02/2020
760/20466/18 HACC 26/02/2020 On the appointment of a trial
760/20466/18 HACC 26/02/2020 On the appointment of a trial
760/20466/18 HACC 23/01/2020
760/20466/18 HACC 10/12/2019
760/20466/18 HACC 10/12/2019
760/20466/18 HACC 10/12/2019
760/20466/18 HACC 10/12/2019
760/20466/18 HACC 10/12/2019
760/20466/18 HACC 10/12/2019
760/20466/18 HACC 27/11/2019
760/20466/18 HACC 27/11/2019
760/20466/18 HACC 27/11/2019
760/20466/18 HACC 27/11/2019
760/20466/18 HACC 04/11/2019 On the appointment of a preparatory court hearing
760/20466/18 HACC 30/10/2019
760/20466/18 CCC 10/10/2019