Search

The case of bribery of Olha Panchenko, head of the Kharkiv District Administrative Court

  • Date of commencement of the case: 15/04/2021
Track case progress If you would like to follow the case, leave your email and get updates sent straight to your inbox
The case of bribery of Olha Panchenko, head of the Kharkiv District Administrative Court The case of bribery of Olha Panchenko, head of the Kharkiv District Administrative Court

Case description

On January 31, 2023, the HACC found Olha Panchenko, the former head of the Kharkiv District Administrative Court, guilty of pressuring and attempting to bribe Judge Olena Zaichko to resolve the land issue in favor of a commercial company.  

Olha Panchenko has been a judge of the Kharkiv District Administrative Court (KDAC) since 2008, and in February 2020, she became the head of the court. Olena Zaichko, whom Panchenko tried to bribe, has also been a HACC judge since 2009.

 

In January 2020, the KDAC received an appeal from the SLICE Housing and Construction Cooperative with a claim against the Department of Urban Development and Architecture of the Kharkiv City Council (DMA) to declare unlawful the refusal to provide the cooperative with urban planning conditions and restrictions for the design of a construction project. Zaichko sustained the claim, but later the State Municipal Administration filed an application for reconsideration of this decision. 

In September 2020, Panchenko offered Judge Zaichko a USD 3,000 bribe for refusing to grant the city department's application for reconsideration, i.e., to rule in favor of the cooperative. The ex-head of the KDAC was detained in her office when she tried to give a bribe to Zaichko. 

The court charged Panchenko with Article 369, part 3 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine and sentenced her to 5 years in prison with a 3-year ban on holding the position of judge.

In March, the defendant filed an appeal. However, she later requested that the proceedings be suspended because Olha Panchenko had been mobilized into the Armed Forces.

  • Proceeding No.: 52020000000000436
  • Case No.: 991/7778/20, 991/7777/20, 991/7776/20, 991/7775/20, 991/8303/20, 991/8837/20, 991/9214/20, 991/9480/20, 991/9711/20, 991/9762/20, 991/9887/20, 991/127/21, 991/582/21, 991/653/21, 991/1041/21, 991/2163/21
  • Incriminated: Article 369, part 3
Instance Key parties Instance /Key parties:
HACC AC
10/03/2023

Panel of judges: Panaid I.V.

HACC
15/04/2021

Panel of judges: Mykhailenko V.V., Shyroka K.Yu., Sikora K.O., Kryklyva T.H., Tanasevych O.V.

Lawyer: Prosianiuk O.V., Ryzhuk M.S., Bilenka B.V., Yeva K.Ye., Sliusara A.M., Podosinova A.O.

Prosecutor: Vysotska N.V., Panchenko O.O.

Infographics

THE CASE OF OF OLHA PANCHENKO

The former head of the Kharkiv District Administrative Court tried to give a bribe to another judge for ruling in an administrative case in favor of a commercial company.

  • September 15, 2020
    Panchenko offered Judge Zaichko a USD 3,000 bribe for refusing to reconsider the previous court decision on the application from the Kharkiv City Council department
  • pic
    September 21, 2020
    Panchenko was detained for handing over a bribe in his office
  • October 8, 2020
    the HACC imposed an interim measure on Panchenko in the form of a personal commitment
  • pic
    January 31, 2023
    the HACC found Panchenko guilty, imprisoned her for 5 years and deprived her of the right to hold the position of a judge for 3 years
  • March 21, 2023
    Panchenko was mobilized to the Armed Forces of Ukraine
  • May 15, 2023
    the HACC Appeals Chamber suspended consideration of the appeal against the first instance decision against Panchenko until she was dismissed from military service

Decisions from the Register

Case No. Court Decision date Decision type
991/7778/20 HACC 18/09/2020
991/7777/20 HACC 18/09/2020
991/7776/20 HACC 18/09/2020
991/7778/20 HACC 18/09/2020
991/7775/20 HACC 18/09/2020
991/7776/20 HACC 18/09/2020
991/7777/20 HACC 18/09/2020
991/7775/20 HACC 23/09/2020
991/8303/20 HACC 08/10/2020
991/8303/20 HACC 08/10/2020
991/8837/20 HACC 28/10/2020
991/8837/20 HACC AC 03/11/2020 On the appointment of a new trial in the court of the first instance
991/8837/20 HACC AC 06/11/2020
991/8837/20 HACC AC 06/11/2020
991/9214/20 HACC 10/11/2020
991/9214/20 HACC 12/11/2020
991/9480/20 HACC 19/11/2020
991/9480/20 HACC 20/11/2020 On the extension of the period of pre-trial investigation of criminal proceedings
991/9711/20 HACC 25/11/2020
991/9711/20 HACC 27/11/2020
991/9762/20 HACC 01/12/2020
991/9762/20 HACC 01/12/2020
991/9887/20 HACC 04/12/2020
991/9887/20 HACC 04/12/2020
991/127/21 HACC 11/01/2021
991/127/21 HACC 13/01/2021
991/582/21 HACC 28/01/2021
991/653/21 HACC 01/02/2021
991/653/21 HACC 04/02/2021
991/582/21 HACC 08/02/2021
991/1041/21 HACC 15/02/2021
991/1041/21 HACC 18/02/2021
991/1041/21 HACC 25/02/2021
991/1041/21 HACC 25/02/2021
991/2163/21 HACC 30/03/2021
991/2163/21 HACC 15/04/2021 On the appointment of a trial
991/2163/21 HACC 15/04/2021 On the appointment of a trial
991/2163/21 HACC 21/04/2021
991/2163/21 HACC 03/11/2021
991/2163/21 HACC 03/11/2021
991/2163/21 HACC 23/11/2021
991/2163/21 HACC 06/12/2021
991/2163/21 HACC 21/01/2022
991/2163/21 HACC 28/01/2022
991/2163/21 HACC 01/02/2022
991/2163/21 HACC 01/02/2022
991/2163/21 HACC 21/06/2022 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
991/2163/21 HACC 18/07/2022 Decision on the implementation of remote court proceedings
991/2163/21 HACC 26/09/2022
991/2163/21 HACC 26/09/2022
991/2163/21 HACC 26/09/2022
991/2163/21 HACC 26/09/2022
991/2163/21 HACC 27/09/2022 Decision on temporary access
991/2163/21 HACC 27/09/2022
991/2163/21 HACC 27/09/2022
991/2163/21 HACC 27/09/2022 Decision on temporary access
991/2163/21 HACC 31/01/2023 Verdicts
991/2163/21 HACC AC 10/03/2023 Opening of appeal proceedings
991/2163/21 HACC AC 10/03/2023 On leaving the appeal without action
991/2163/21 HACC AC 27/03/2023 Opening of appeal proceedings
991/2163/21 HACC AC 11/04/2023
991/2163/21 HACC AC 15/05/2023
991/2163/21 HACC AC 15/05/2023