Case of UAH 43.3 million in damages to Pavlohrad Chemical Plant

Case of UAH 43.3 million in damages to Pavlohrad Chemical Plant
Start of the trial 3 March 2023
Instance HACC
Stage of criminal proceedings Judicial proceedings

The HACC found Leonid Shyman, Director General of the state enterprise Pavlohrad Chemical Plant, and Commercial Director Valerii Kyrylov guilty of abuse of official position, which caused the state enterprise over UAH 43.3 million in damages.

The defendants in the case are:

  • Leonid Shyman, Director General of the SE Research and Production Association Pavlohrad Chemical Plant (hereinafter — SE RPA PCP);
  • Valerii Kyrylov, Commercial Director of the same state enterprise;

Leonid Shyman
Leonid Shyman

Yevhen Fomin, director of the private intermediary companies Research and Production Enterprise Zoria LLC, Ukrspetskhim LLC, and Ukrspetskhem LLC, was also charged in the case. After the indictment was referred to court, Fomin was out of contact for a long time and did not appear at hearings — as it turned out, because he was on the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine. He was later put on the wanted list, and the materials concerning him were severed into separate proceedings and suspended. The court did not authorize in absentia proceedings in his case.

According to the investigation, between 2013 and 2016, Leonid Shyman, Director General of SE RPA PCP, conspired with Commercial Director Valerii Kyrylov and private company owner Yevhen Fomin to sell industrial explosives manufactured by the state enterprise through controlled intermediary firms.

The companies controlled by Yevhen Fomin bought explosives from the plant at reduced prices and resold them to actual customers at a markup of about 30%. The intermediaries served a paper function only: products were shipped to the end customers — mining companies PJSC Kryvyi Rih Iron Ore Plant and PJSC Central Mining and Processing Plant — directly from the state enterprise's warehouses, with no involvement of the intermediaries' resources.

To secure the controlled companies' monopoly position, Leonid Shyman and Valerii Kyrylov deliberately blocked SE RPA PCP from working directly with other counterparties. When representatives of the mining companies tried to enter direct contracts with RPA PCP, plant officials either turned them down — urging them to approach Fomin's firms — or set prices significantly higher than those offered by the intermediaries.

The state enterprise was thus denied genuine market profits, and over UAH 43.3 million that should have gone to the budget was funneled to the accounts of private companies.

The defendants' actions were classified under Article 364(2) of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.

Together with the criminal case, the court also took up the prosecutor's civil claim for recovery of UAH 43.3 million in damages. The defendants' bank accounts and real estate were frozen.

The court also imposed monetary penalties on Leonid Shyman twice for failing to appear at hearings due to business trips. As it turned out, the defendant had signed his own business-trip orders.

In August 2026, the HACC found Shyman and Kyrylov guilty under Article 28(2) and Article 364(2) of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Leonid Shyman was sentenced to five years' imprisonment, a fine of UAH 17,000, and a three-year ban on holding managerial positions.

Valerii Kyrylov was sentenced to 4.3 years' imprisonment, a fine of UAH 15,300, and a three-year ban on holding managerial positions.

The court also granted the civil claim and ordered the defendants to pay UAH 36.2 million jointly and severally, in favor of the state as represented by the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, as compensation for damages caused by their actions.

This is not the first case against Leonid Shyman. He is also named in cases concerning:

  • the supply of UAH 3.3 billion worth of defective mortar shells to the Armed Forces of Ukraine (the case is being heard by the Shevchenkivskyi District Court of Kyiv);
  • the embezzlement of UAH 102.4 million during the procurement of reactive armor for the Armed Forces' armored vehicles;
  • the procurement of measuring instruments for the plant at inflated prices;
  • abuses involving nearly UAH 28.5 million during a 2016 pipe procurement.

In a separate case, Valerii Kyrylov received a four-year prison sentence for the sham use of intermediary companies in the sale of explosives produced by SE RPA PCP. His actions caused over UAH 7 million in damages to the state. The HACC Appeals Chamber upheld the verdict.

Proceeding No. 42016040010000006
Case No. 991/1821/23
Date the hearing was scheduled 03/03/2023
Subjects
  • Business
  • Head of a state or municipal enterprise/institution
Qualification
Article 191, part 5, Article 364, part 2, Article 191, part 4, Article 209, part 3
Pre-trial cases №
  • 991/5/23
  • 991/3028/22
  • 991/1097/22
  • 991/1096/22
  • 991/6232/21
  • 991/8272/21
  • 991/6611/21
  • 991/7179/21
  • 991/6536/21
  • 991/6231/21
  • 991/6270/21
  • 991/6614/21
  • 991/6271/21
  • 991/5728/21
  • 991/5835/21
  • 991/5836/21
  • 991/5186/21
  • 991/5727/21
  • 991/4518/21
  • 991/2158/20
  • 991/9/20
  • 991/8/20
Instance Key parties
HACC 03/03/2023 Panel of judges: Mykhailenko V.V.
THE LEONID SHYMAN CASE
Judicial proceedings

The HACC found Leonid Shyman, Director General of the state enterprise Pavlohrad Chemical Plant, and Commercial Director Valerii Kyrylov guilty of abuse of official position and of selling the state enterprise's products at inflated prices through intermediary companies. Shyman and Kyrylov were sentenced to imprisonment with additional penalties.

Article 364(2) of the Criminal Code of Ukraine

  • pic
    2013–2016
    Shyman, Kyrylov, and Fomin organized and operated a scheme to sell the state enterprise's products at inflated prices through intermediary companies
  • January 11, 2016
    NABU detectives launched the pre-trial investigation
  • pic
    August 16, 2021
    Valerii Kyrylov and Yevhen Fomin were served with notices of suspicion
  • pic
    August 25, 2021
    The court set UAH 181,000 bail as a preventive measure for Yevhen Fomin
  • pic
    September 1, 2021
    The court set UAH 681,000 bail as a preventive measure for Valerii Kyrylov
  • pic
    September 9, 2021
    Leonid Shyman was served with a notice of suspicion
  • pic
    September 15, 2021
    The court set UAH 10 million bail as a preventive measure for Leonid Shyman
  • pic
    October 5, 2021
    The HACC Appeals Chamber kept Shyman on UAH 10 million bail
  • November 30, 2022
    The NABU concluded the pre-trial investigation and granted the defense access to the case file
  • pic
    February 28, 2023
    The prosecutor referred the indictment to court
  • March 3, 2023
    A preparatory hearing was scheduled in the case
  • pic
    July 27, 2023
    Fomin was placed on the wanted list and proceedings against him were suspended; the court denied special judicial proceedings
  • January 26, 2024
    The HACC ordered a forensic medical examination after Valerii Kyrylov failed to appear at hearings on allegedly health-related grounds
  • March 14, 2024
    The HACC scheduled the case against Shyman and Kyrylov for trial on the merits, together with SAPO's civil claim
  • pic
    November 5, 2025
    The HACC reduced Shyman's bail to UAH 8 million
  • pic
    March 17, 2026
    The HACC placed a witness in the case on the wanted list
  • pic
    August 12, 2026
    the HACC found Shyman and Kyrylov guilty and sentenced them to five and 4.3 years' imprisonment, respectively, with fines and a three-year ban on holding positions involving administrative-economic and organizational-managerial functions

Decisions from the Register

Case No. Court Decision type
991/1821/23 HACC 12/08/2026 Verdicts
991/1821/23 HACC 04/08/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 03/08/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 07/07/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 10/06/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 08/06/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 08/06/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 08/06/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 08/06/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 02/06/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 07/05/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 24/04/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 09/04/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 09/04/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 03/04/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 30/03/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 30/03/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 17/03/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 17/03/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 06/03/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 04/03/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 02/03/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 23/02/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 19/01/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 16/01/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 16/01/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 12/01/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 12/01/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 09/01/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 09/01/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 09/01/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 09/01/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 09/01/2026
991/1821/23 HACC 12/12/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 11/12/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 08/12/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 02/12/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 26/11/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 20/11/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 17/11/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 14/11/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 05/11/2025 On changing the interim measure, Decision to change the interim measure
991/1821/23 HACC 05/11/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 05/11/2025 On changing the interim measure, Decision to change the interim measure
991/1821/23 HACC 15/10/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 13/10/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 13/10/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 13/10/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 06/10/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 01/10/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 18/09/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 18/09/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 07/08/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 07/08/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 06/08/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 30/07/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 24/07/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 24/07/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 24/07/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 15/07/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 14/07/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 11/07/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 09/07/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 26/06/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 26/06/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 24/06/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 23/06/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 23/06/2025
991/1821/23 HACC AC 17/03/2025
991/1821/23 HACC AC 17/03/2025
991/1821/23 HACC AC 18/02/2025 Completion of the preparation and appointment of the appeal hearing
991/1821/23 HACC AC 06/02/2025 Opening of appeal proceedings
991/1821/23 HACC 24/01/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 24/01/2025
991/1821/23 HACC 12/07/2024 Decision to cancel the seizure of property
991/1821/23 HACC 11/07/2024 Decision to cancel the seizure of property
991/1821/23 HACC 13/05/2024
991/1821/23 HACC 08/05/2024
991/1821/23 HACC 14/03/2024 On the appointment of a trial, On changing the interim measure
991/1821/23 HACC 14/03/2024
991/1821/23 HACC 14/03/2024 On changing the interim measure, On the appointment of a trial
991/1821/23 HACC 14/03/2024
991/1821/23 HACC 08/03/2024
991/1821/23 HACC 08/03/2024
991/1821/23 HACC 08/03/2024
991/1821/23 HACC 08/03/2024
991/1821/23 HACC 26/01/2024
991/1821/23 HACC 26/01/2024
991/1821/23 HACC 26/01/2024
991/1821/23 HACC 26/01/2024
991/1821/23 HACC 18/01/2024
991/1821/23 HACC 18/01/2024
991/1821/23 HACC 18/01/2024
991/1821/23 HACC 18/01/2024
991/1821/23 HACC 28/12/2023
991/1821/23 HACC 28/12/2023
991/1821/23 HACC 19/12/2023
991/1821/23 HACC 19/12/2023
991/1821/23 HACC 10/11/2023
991/1821/23 HACC 06/11/2023
991/1821/23 HACC 24/10/2023
991/1821/23 HACC 24/10/2023
991/1821/23 HACC 13/10/2023
991/1821/23 HACC 27/07/2023 On the suspension of court proceedings
991/1821/23 HACC 27/07/2023
991/1821/23 HACC 27/07/2023
991/1821/23 HACC 27/07/2023 On the suspension of court proceedings
991/1821/23 HACC 05/06/2023
991/1821/23 HACC 15/03/2023
991/1821/23 HACC 03/03/2023 On the appointment of a preparatory court hearing
991/1821/23 HACC 28/02/2023
991/5/23 CCC 09/02/2023
991/5/23 HACC AC 26/01/2023 On the refusal to open appeal proceedings
991/5/23 HACC 09/01/2023
991/5/23 HACC 09/01/2023
991/5/23 HACC 09/01/2023
991/3028/22 HACC 17/08/2022
991/3028/22 HACC 17/08/2022
991/1097/22 HACC 18/04/2022
991/1097/22 HACC 18/04/2022
991/1096/22 HACC 21/03/2022
991/1096/22 HACC 21/03/2022
991/1096/22 HACC 17/03/2022
991/1097/22 HACC 17/02/2022
991/6232/21 HACC AC 12/01/2022
991/8272/21 HACC 14/12/2021 Decision on temporary access
991/8272/21 HACC 14/12/2021 Decision on temporary access
991/8272/21 HACC 10/12/2021
991/6611/21 HACC 17/11/2021
991/6232/21 HACC AC 03/11/2021 Decision on partial granting of appeals
991/6232/21 HACC AC 03/11/2021 Decision on partial granting of appeals
991/6232/21 HACC 03/11/2021
991/6232/21 HACC 03/11/2021
991/6611/21 HACC 02/11/2021
991/7179/21 HACC 02/11/2021
991/6536/21 HACC AC 27/10/2021
991/6231/21 HACC AC 27/10/2021
991/6231/21 HACC AC 27/10/2021
991/6536/21 HACC AC 27/10/2021
991/6231/21 HACC 27/10/2021
991/6231/21 HACC 27/10/2021
991/6536/21 HACC 27/10/2021
991/6536/21 HACC 27/10/2021
991/6270/21 HACC 04/10/2021
991/6270/21 HACC AC 04/10/2021
991/6270/21 HACC AC 04/10/2021
991/6611/21 HACC 29/09/2021
991/6614/21 HACC 29/09/2021
991/6614/21 HACC 29/09/2021
991/6611/21 HACC 29/09/2021 Decision to cancel the seizure of property
991/6270/21 HACC 15/09/2021
991/6271/21 HACC 13/09/2021
991/5728/21 HACC 01/09/2021
991/5728/21 HACC AC 01/09/2021
991/5728/21 HACC AC 01/09/2021
991/5835/21 HACC 27/08/2021
991/5836/21 HACC 27/08/2021
991/5836/21 HACC 27/08/2021
991/5835/21 HACC 27/08/2021
991/5186/21 HACC 25/08/2021
991/5727/21 HACC 25/08/2021
991/5727/21 HACC 25/08/2021
991/5728/21 HACC 20/08/2021
991/4518/21 HACC 08/07/2021
991/2158/20 HACC 20/03/2020 Decision to cancel the seizure of property
991/2158/20 HACC 20/03/2020 Decision to cancel the seizure of property
991/9/20 HACC 14/01/2020
991/8/20 HACC 14/01/2020