Search

Bribes for lifting arrests from airplanes: the case of judges of the Kyiv Court of Appeal

  • Date of commencement of the case: 05/12/2023
Track case progress If you would like to follow the case, leave your email and get updates sent straight to your inbox
Bribes for lifting arrests from airplanes: the case of judges of the Kyiv Court of Appeal Bribes for lifting arrests from airplanes: the case of judges of the Kyiv Court of Appeal

Case description

The NABU and the SAPO suspect four judges of the Kyiv Court of Appeal (KCA) of receiving USD 35,000 in bribes to lift the arrest of airplanes.

In November 2023, anti-corruption authorities exposed four KCA judges—Viacheslav Dziubin, Ihor Palenyk, Viktor Hlynianyi, and Yurii Slyva. According to the detectives, they received USD 35,000 for canceling the arrest of two unique An-74TK-100 aircraft, which had been approved by a representative of Aircompany Constanta PJSC, Tetiana Polishchuk.

These aircraft were material evidence in the criminal proceedings for obstructing the lawful activities of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. In addition, they are owned by the Estonian company EKA GRUPP OU, and the holders in Ukraine were Motor Sich JSC and Aircompany Constanta PJSC.

For this "service," Polishchuk offered USD 35,000 to Dziubin and three of his colleagues. The judge planned to keep USD 5,000 for himself as an intermediary, and divide the rest among the judges of the panel—each was to receive USD 10,000.

Subsequently, according to the investigation, Dziubin received consent from his colleagues Palenyk, Hlynianyi, and Slyva, who were to hear the case on appeal. However, as it turned out later, he was not going to give them USD 30,000. Dziubin estimated his "mediation" at USD 10,000, and gave the remaining USD 25,000 to his colleagues for distribution.

Finally, in late November, the panel of judges lifted the arrest of one of the planes, and Dziubin received the money in a car from Tetiana Polishchuk at a regular meeting. The money was divided, but the next day, law enforcement officers detained all four judges involved and searched their homes.

Detectives recorded the further path of the bribe. Dziubin left his share in his office. The judge put the rest of the money, namely USD 25,000, into a whiskey box and took it to Palenyk's office, where they had a short dialogue. 

Dzyubin: "It's cognac, cognac. Not cognac, but whiskey, everything as you like it." Palenyk put the box under the table at that moment, and Dziubin added: "Drink to my health."

Judge Palenyk was next. He was to give  USD 8,300 each to his colleagues Hlynianyi and Slyva; he replaced the banknotes with his own and then packaged them in a coffee bag and an Internet provider's advertising package.

At the same time, he used his "best" acting skills to distribute the "reward." While passing the bribe to Hlynyanyi under the guise of an advertisement, Palenyk said, "Here is an advertisement, you can read it, the Internet quality is good."

He handed the rest of the bribe to Judge Slyva in a coffee package and said: "Take the coffee, the coffee, you treated me to it, it's instant, they say it's good." At home, in addition to the bribe itself, detectives found and seized USD 115,000 and EUR 410 packaged in coffee bags.

All the defendants are charged with Article 368(4) of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Dziubin, Palenyk, Hlynyanyi and Slyva face 8 to 12 years in prison with confiscation of property and a ban on holding certain positions for up to 3 years.

During the searches, they found USD 10,000 transferred to Dziubin as an improper advantage, and they found the entire USD25,000 bribe from Palenyk, as the investigation believes he changed the banknotes before handing them over to Judges Slyva and Hlynianyi. Slyva and Hlynianyi were found to have USD 8,300 each. 

  • Proceeding No.: 52023000000000547
  • Case No.: 991/10588/23, 991/10589/23, 991/10582/23, 991/10580/23, 991/10658/23, 991/10655/23, 991/10657/23, 991/10656/23, 991/10522/23, 991/10581/23, 991/11055/23, 991/10579/23, 991/10592/23, 991/11048/23, 991/11219/23, 991/11004/23, 991/510/24, 991/844/24, 991/845/24, 991/789/24, 991/790/24, 991/959/24, 991/1187/24, 991/1184/24, 991/996/24, 991/995/24, 991/2074/24, 991/2374/24, 991/2474/24, 991/2475/24, 991/2947/24, 991/2946/24, 991/4398/24, 991/4399/24, 991/4856/24, 991/4855/24, 991/5130/24, 991/6178/24, 991/6492/24, 991/6466/24, 991/7915/24, 991/10578/23, 991/9743/23
  • Incriminated: Article 368, part 3, Article 368, part 4
Instance Key parties Instance /Key parties:
HACC
05/12/2023

Panel of judges: Shkodin Ya.V., Strohyi I.L., Maslov V.V., Zadorozhna L.I.

Infographics

THE CASE OF JUDGES OF THE KYIV COURT OF APPEAL

Four KAC judges allegedly received USD 35,000 in bribes for a decision to lift the arrest of the planes.

  • November 29, 2023
    the NABU and the SAPO detained four judges for receiving money
  • pic
    November 30, 2023
    Four KAC judges were served with suspicion notices
  • December 4, 2023
    The HCJ granted consent to the detention of 4 KAC judges
  • pic
    December 5, 2023
    The HACC took Judge Hlynianyi in custody with an alternative of UAH 4 million bail
  • pic
    December 5, 2023
    The HACC took Judge Palenyk into custody with an alternative of UAH 4 million bail
  • pic
    December 6, 2023
    The HACC took Judge Slyva into custody with an alternative of UAH 2.5 million bail
  • December 15, 2023
    The HCJ dismissed Hlynianyi and Slyva from the administration of justice
  • December 29, 2023
    The HCJ removed Dziubin and Palenyk from the administration of justice
  • pic
    December 18, 2023
    The HACC took Judge Dzyubin into custody with an alternative of UAH 4 million bail
  • January 23, 2024
    The HACC extended the term of investigation of the case

Decisions from the Register

Case No. Court Decision date Decision type
991/10588/23 HACC 05/12/2023
991/10588/23 HACC 05/12/2023
991/10588/23 HACC 07/12/2023
991/10588/23 HACC 07/12/2023
991/10588/23 HACC 07/12/2023
991/10588/23 HACC 07/12/2023
991/10589/23 HACC 13/12/2023
991/10589/23 HACC 13/12/2023
991/10588/23 HACC 18/12/2023 On the imposition of an interim measure in the form of detention
991/10588/23 HACC 18/12/2023 On the imposition of an interim measure in the form of detention
991/10582/23 HACC AC 18/12/2023
991/10588/23 HACC AC 18/12/2023
991/10588/23 HACC AC 18/12/2023
991/10588/23 HACC AC 18/12/2023
991/10588/23 HACC AC 18/12/2023
991/10582/23 HACC AC 19/12/2023
991/10580/23 HACC 19/12/2023
991/10580/23 HACC 19/12/2023
991/10582/23 HACC AC 19/12/2023
991/10658/23 HACC 19/12/2023
991/10655/23 HACC 19/12/2023
991/10657/23 HACC 19/12/2023
991/10656/23 HACC 19/12/2023
991/10658/23 HACC 19/12/2023
991/10657/23 HACC 19/12/2023
991/10656/23 HACC 19/12/2023
991/10655/23 HACC 19/12/2023
991/10522/23 HACC 20/12/2023
991/10522/23 HACC 20/12/2023
991/10522/23 HACC AC 20/12/2023
991/10522/23 HACC AC 20/12/2023
991/10581/23 HACC 22/12/2023
991/10581/23 HACC 22/12/2023
991/10581/23 HACC AC 22/12/2023 On closing appeal proceedings
991/11055/23 HACC 22/12/2023
991/10579/23 HACC 25/12/2023
991/10579/23 HACC 25/12/2023
991/10579/23 HACC AC 25/12/2023
991/10579/23 HACC AC 25/12/2023
991/10592/23 HACC 26/12/2023 On the imposition of an interim measure in the form of detention
991/10592/23 HACC 26/12/2023 On the imposition of an interim measure in the form of detention
991/10592/23 HACC AC 26/12/2023
991/10592/23 HACC AC 26/12/2023
991/11048/23 HACC 28/12/2023
991/11219/23 HACC 01/01/2024
991/10582/23 HACC 12/01/2024
991/10582/23 HACC 12/01/2024
991/10589/23 HACC 12/01/2024
991/11004/23 HACC 12/01/2024
991/10589/23 HACC 12/01/2024
991/10582/23 HACC AC 12/01/2024
991/10582/23 HACC AC 12/01/2024
991/11004/23 HACC AC 12/01/2024
991/10589/23 HACC AC 12/01/2024
991/10582/23 HACC AC 12/01/2024 Decision on renewal of the term of appeal
991/11004/23 HACC AC 12/01/2024
991/10582/23 HACC AC 12/01/2024
991/10582/23 HACC AC 12/01/2024
991/10589/23 HACC AC 12/01/2024
991/10582/23 HACC AC 12/01/2024
991/510/24 HACC 23/01/2024 On the extension of the period of pre-trial investigation of criminal proceedings
991/510/24 HACC 23/01/2024 On the extension of the period of pre-trial investigation of criminal proceedings
991/844/24 HACC 01/02/2024
991/844/24 HACC 01/02/2024
991/845/24 HACC 02/02/2024
991/845/24 HACC 02/02/2024
991/789/24 HACC 02/02/2024
991/790/24 HACC 02/02/2024
991/789/24 HACC 02/02/2024
991/790/24 HACC 02/02/2024
991/959/24 HACC 15/02/2024
991/1187/24 HACC 15/02/2024
991/1184/24 HACC 15/02/2024
991/1184/24 HACC 15/02/2024
991/996/24 HACC 15/02/2024
991/1187/24 HACC 15/02/2024
991/995/24 HACC 20/02/2024
991/2074/24 HACC 14/03/2024
991/2374/24 HACC 26/03/2024
991/2374/24 HACC 26/03/2024
991/2474/24 HACC 28/03/2024
991/2474/24 HACC 28/03/2024
991/2475/24 HACC 03/04/2024
991/2475/24 HACC 03/04/2024
991/2074/24 HACC 09/04/2024
991/2074/24 HACC 09/04/2024
991/2074/24 HACC AC 09/04/2024
991/2074/24 HACC AC 09/04/2024
991/2947/24 HACC 10/04/2024
991/2946/24 HACC 10/04/2024
991/2947/24 HACC 10/04/2024
991/2946/24 HACC 10/04/2024
991/4398/24 HACC 24/05/2024
991/4399/24 HACC 27/05/2024
991/4399/24 HACC 27/05/2024
991/4856/24 HACC 10/06/2024
991/4856/24 HACC 10/06/2024
991/4855/24 HACC 10/06/2024
991/4855/24 HACC 10/06/2024
991/4856/24 HACC AC 19/06/2024
991/5130/24 HACC 04/07/2024
991/5130/24 HACC 04/07/2024
991/4856/24 HACC AC 09/07/2024
991/6178/24 HACC 19/07/2024
991/6492/24 HACC 05/08/2024
991/6466/24 HACC AC 21/08/2024
991/7915/24 HACC 29/08/2024
991/7915/24 HACC 29/08/2024
991/10578/23 HACC AC 17/09/2024
991/9743/23 HACC AC 17/09/2024