Case of Developer Andrii Nemeriuk over Housing for the National Guard

Case of Developer Andrii Nemeriuk over Housing for the National Guard
Start of the trial 23 July 2021
Date of verdict 19 December 2024
Instance HACC
Stage of criminal proceedings Judicial proceedings

The HACC approved a plea agreement in the case concerning embezzlement in the procurement of apartments for the National Guard.

Under the terms of the agreement, Kyiv developer Andrii Nemeriuk and two individuals connected to him — Dmytro Lashkovitser and Oleh Voinalovych — admitted their guilt. Their actions were reclassified as fraud. On the basis of the agreement, they were sentenced to imprisonment with a probationary period. Earlier, the HACC had closed the proceedings against two National Guard officials, who had been charged with official negligence, due to the expiry of the limitation period.

In 2017, over UAH 85 million was allocated from Ukraine's state budget to purchase housing for National Guard service members. Upon learning of this, Andrii Nemeriuk, a developer from Khmelnytskyi Region, decided to exploit the state program for his own benefit. He conceived a plan to appropriate part of the budget funds allocated for apartments for the military.

Andrii Nemeriuk. Screenshot from a video
Andrii Nemeriuk. Screenshot from a video

To carry out this plan, he needed both National Guard officials who sat on the tender committee and controlled firms through which the scheme could be run. In particular, according to the investigation, Nemeriuk drew the following into the scheme:

  • Leonid Sikora, Head of the Quartering and Capital Construction Directorate for Logistics of the NGU Main Directorate;
  • Mykola Modlinskyi, Head of the Finance Department of the same NGU directorate;
  • Dmytro Lashkovitser, director of Buchazhytlobud-Credit LLC;
  • Oleh Voinalovych, head of the Bucha-Zhytlobud No. 1 housing construction cooperative.

Oleksandr Yarosh, Deputy Head of the Quartering and Capital Construction Directorate for Logistics of the National Guard Main Directorate, was also brought into the scheme, but, as the investigation established, he was not part of the group.

Acting as a criminal group, they influenced the housing procurement procedure by defining the need specifically for apartments in Kyiv Region. To carry out the plan, they selected the Forest Land residential complex in Bucha, which at the time had not even been completed — only a few sections of the building had been finished.

To create the appearance that the developer had apartments available, Nemeriuk concluded fictitious buyout agreements for the not-yet-completed apartments with a controlled firm run by his mother-in-law. According to the detectives, Nemeriuk's company actually paid for only four apartments, while the rest remained unpaid for. The developer's calculation was simple: to make the National Guard pay for unfinished apartments as if they were turnkey-ready, and pocket the difference.

Nemeriuk controlled dozens of legal entities registered in the names of acquaintances, through which he carried out construction. It was these firms that were formally responsible for the properties listed in the documents and, in the event of a scandal, would serve as scapegoats.

The particular cynicism of the scheme lay in the fact that some of the apartments sold to the National Guard belonged to retail housing investors who had financed the construction. In effect, someone else's property was being sold to the military. How Nemeriuk planned to settle up with the defrauded investors is unclear.

Despite all this, Nemeriuk's company entered an open tender and won by offering the lowest price. The bid was, unsurprisingly, the lowest, because what was essentially being sold were unfinished buildings rather than completed housing, and moreover investors had already paid for them. After that, with the help of National Guard officials, the group members created the impression that the housing was ready for residents to move in. The documentation stated that the apartments were fully habitable, although in reality the building was not connected to the power grid, the sewage system did not work, and interior work had been only partially completed.

Following the tender, the National Guard concluded contracts with Nemeriuk's company to purchase 22 apartments in the Forest Land residential complex. The Guard paid over UAH 17.3 million in budget funds for these apartments.

How the embezzlement scheme in the procurement of apartments for the National Guard operated. Source: NABU
How the embezzlement scheme in the procurement of apartments for the National Guard operated. Source: NABU

Initially, all members of the group were charged under Article 191(5) and Article 366(2) of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. The proceedings against the National Guard officials Sikora and Modlinskyi were severed into a separate case because they had been put on the wanted list. When the case reached the court, the actions of Sikora and Modlinskyi were reclassified as official negligence under Article 367 of the Criminal Code, for which the limitation period had already expired. They were therefore released from criminal liability.

Nemeriuk himself, as well as Lashkovitser and Voinalovych, agreed to a plea agreement. Shortly before concluding this agreement, the prosecution reclassified their actions as fraud (Article 190 of the Criminal Code), that is, a non-corruption offense.

Under the terms of the agreement, Nemeriuk and his accomplices fully compensated the damages, returning over UAH 17 million to the state. As a result, all three received a sentence of five years' imprisonment with a probationary period. Nemeriuk was also banned from holding certain positions for one year.

The construction of the Forest Land complex remains mired in scandal to this day. Dozens of defrauded investors still cannot obtain their apartments; they are appealing to the authorities and the courts, forming action groups, and closely following the court cases.

During the proceedings, the developer hid from the court for a time, so he was put on the wanted list, and the HACC conducted special court proceedings in his absence. Nemeriuk later appeared, and the court continued the proceedings with his participation.

This is not the only corruption case involving housing for National Guard members. In another National Guard apartments case, the suspects include former NGU Commander Yurii Allerov and former MP Maksym Mykytas.

Proceeding No. 12020000000000081
Case No. 991/4875/21
Date the hearing was scheduled 23/07/2021
Subjects
  • Business
  • Other
Qualification
Article 191, part 5, Article 364, part 2, Article 366, part 1, Article 190, part 5
Pre-trial cases №
  • 991/4589/21
  • 991/4562/21
  • 991/2655/21
  • 991/3986/21
  • 991/3908/21
  • 991/3197/21
  • 991/2654/21
  • 991/2077/21
  • 991/2171/21
  • 991/1533/21
  • 991/1290/21
  • 991/1546/21
  • 991/1291/21
  • 991/1220/21
  • 991/718/21
  • 991/486/21
  • 991/10564/20
  • 991/9840/20
  • 991/9476/20
  • 991/9838/20
  • 991/9302/20
  • 991/9680/20
  • 991/9584/20
  • 991/8678/20
  • 991/6115/20
  • 991/7252/20
  • 991/8869/20
  • 991/8412/20
  • 991/8562/20
  • 991/8408/20
  • 991/8298/20
  • 991/7827/20
  • 991/7983/20
  • 991/7893/20
  • 991/7805/20
  • 991/7253/20
  • 991/6424/20
  • 991/6423/20
  • 991/6425/20
  • 991/6407/20
  • 991/6408/20
  • 991/6453/20
  • 991/6421/20
  • 991/5902/20
  • 991/5900/20
  • 991/5901/20
  • 991/5898/20
  • 991/5894/20
  • 991/5897/20
  • 991/5905/20
  • 991/5906/20
  • 991/5895/20
  • 991/5908/20
  • 991/5907/20
  • 991/5903/20
  • 991/5899/20
  • 991/5896/20
  • 991/5987/20
  • 991/5988/20
  • 991/5965/20
  • 991/5966/20
  • 991/4721/20
  • 991/4716/20
  • 991/4722/20
  • 991/5543/20
  • 991/5545/20
  • 991/5184/20
  • 991/5478/20
  • 991/5479/20
  • 991/5188/20
  • 991/3200/20
  • 991/4397/20
  • 991/4398/20
  • 991/4399/20
  • 991/4419/20
  • 991/4018/20
  • 991/4019/20
  • 991/4020/20
  • 991/3455/20
  • 991/3454/20
  • 991/1922/20
  • 991/3457/20
  • 991/3456/20
  • 991/3341/20
  • 991/3340/20
  • 991/3459/20
  • 991/3525/20
  • 991/3458/20
  • 991/3273/20
  • 991/3269/20
  • 991/3272/20
  • 991/3271/20
  • 991/3268/20
  • 991/3270/20
  • 991/3148/20
  • 991/3146/20
  • 991/3179/20
  • 991/3138/20
  • 991/2040/20
  • 991/3175/20
  • 991/3147/20
  • 991/3176/20
  • 991/3177/20
  • 991/3149/20
  • 991/3123/20
  • 991/3122/20
  • 991/3124/20
  • 991/3203/20
  • 991/2598/20
  • 991/1551/20
Merged with
Instance Key parties
HACC 23/07/2021 Panel of judges: Fedorov O.V.
FRAUD IN THE PROCUREMENT OF HOUSING FOR THE NATIONAL GUARD
Judicial proceedings

The HACC approved a plea agreement between the prosecutor and three individuals in the case — developer Andrii Nemeriuk, along with Dmytro Lashkovitser and Oleh Voinalovych. They were found guilty of fraud in the procurement of apartments for the National Guard of Ukraine. The proceedings against the National Guard officials Modlinskyi and Sikora were closed under the statute of limitations.

  • pic
    2017
    Nemeriuk organized a scheme through which UAH 17.3 million disappeared from the state budget
  • January 31, 2020
    the National Police opened criminal proceedings over possible embezzlement in the procurement of apartments for the National Guard
  • February 29, 2020
    NABU detectives opened an investigation into the same fact
  • pic
    July 20–21, 2020
    the NABU served notices of suspicion on Nemeriuk, Sikora, Modlinskyi, and other individuals in the case
  • pic
    July 24, 2020
    Modlinskyi was put on the wanted list, and the materials concerning them were severed into separate criminal proceedings
  • August 5, 2020
    the HACC released the director of Buchazhytlobud-Credit LLC, Dmytro Lashkovitser, on personal recognizance
  • August 6, 2020
    the HACC released the head of the Bucha-Zhytlobud No. 1 housing construction cooperative, Oleh Voinalovych, on personal recognizance
  • pic
    August 6, 2020
    the HACC imposed on Mykola Modlinskyi a preventive measure of bail in the amount of UAH 500,000
  • August 10, 2020
    the HACC released the former Head of the Quartering and Capital Construction Directorate for Logistics of the NGU Main Directorate, Leonid Sikora, on personal recognizance
  • pic
    September 16, 2020
    the NABU put Andrii Nemeriuk on the wanted list
  • September 28, 2020
    the HACC refused to arrest Nemeriuk in absentia
  • November 4, 2020
    the HACC Appeals Chamber arrested Nemeriuk in absentia
  • December 1, 2020
    the HACC refused to allow an in absentia investigation of Andrii Nemeriuk
  • December 15, 2020
    the HACC Appeals Chamber allowed an in absentia investigation of Nemeriuk
  • January 13, 2021
    the HACC granted the detective's motion to set a deadline for the defense to review the pre-trial investigation materials
  • January 18, 2021
    the NABU completed the in absentia investigation of Andrii Nemeriuk
  • pic
    July 20, 2021
    the HACC received the indictment charging some of the participants in the scheme to embezzle funds in the procurement of apartments
  • July 23, 2021
    a preparatory hearing was scheduled in the case
  • March 15, 2023
    the case was referred for consideration on the merits
  • March 19, 2024
    the HACC referred the second part of the case for consideration on the merits and ruled to conduct special court proceedings, that is, in Nemeriuk's absence
  • April 24, 2024
    the HACC joined the two proceedings: one concerning Modlinskyi and Nemeriuk, the other concerning the remaining individuals in the case
  • December 4, 2024
    the court resumed the hearing under the ordinary procedure, since the defendant Nemeriuk appeared at the session
  • December 11, 2024
    the HACC closed the case against the two National Guard officials, Sikora and Modlinskyi, due to the expiry of the limitation period
  • December 17, 2024
    the prosecutor submitted to the HACC a plea agreement concluded with Nemeriuk, Lashkovitser, and Voinalovych
  • pic
    December 19, 2024
    the HACC handed down a verdict on the basis of the agreement, finding Nemeriuk, Lashkovitser, and Voinalovych guilty of fraud and imposing a sentence of imprisonment with a probationary period

Decisions from the Register

Case No. Court Decision type
991/4875/21 HACC 24/02/2025
991/4875/21 HACC AC 27/01/2025
991/4875/21 HACC 19/12/2024 Verdicts
991/4875/21 HACC 19/12/2024
991/4875/21 HACC 11/12/2024
991/4875/21 HACC 25/09/2024 Decision on the exemption from criminal liability in connection with the expiration of the statute of limitations for the commission of a criminal offense
991/4875/21 HACC 25/09/2024 Decision on the exemption from criminal liability in connection with the expiration of the statute of limitations for the commission of a criminal offense
991/4875/21 HACC 24/09/2024
991/4875/21 HACC 30/07/2024
991/4875/21 HACC 24/04/2024
991/4875/21 HACC 24/04/2024
991/4875/21 HACC 26/03/2024
991/4875/21 HACC 12/12/2023
991/4875/21 HACC 28/11/2023
991/4875/21 HACC 13/09/2023
991/4875/21 HACC 13/09/2023
991/4875/21 HACC 26/04/2023
991/4875/21 HACC 26/04/2023
991/4875/21 HACC 26/04/2023
991/4875/21 HACC 26/04/2023
991/4875/21 HACC 25/04/2023
991/4875/21 HACC 15/03/2023 Decision on the refusal/granting of the motion for the return of the indictment, On the appointment of a trial
991/4875/21 HACC 15/03/2023 Decision on the refusal/granting of the motion for the return of the indictment, On the appointment of a trial
991/4875/21 HACC 08/02/2023 Decision on the exemption from criminal liability in connection with the expiration of the statute of limitations for the commission of a criminal offense
991/4875/21 HACC 08/02/2023 Decision on the exemption from criminal liability in connection with the expiration of the statute of limitations for the commission of a criminal offense
991/4875/21 HACC 28/09/2022
991/4875/21 HACC 28/09/2022
991/4875/21 HACC 06/07/2022
991/4875/21 HACC 06/07/2022
991/4875/21 HACC 20/12/2021
991/4875/21 CCC 20/12/2021 On the refusal to open cassation proceedings
991/4875/21 HACC 01/12/2021
991/4875/21 HACC 01/12/2021
991/4875/21 HACC 05/11/2021
991/4875/21 HACC 25/10/2021
991/4875/21 HACC AC 14/09/2021 Decision on the consideration of a recusal
991/4875/21 HACC AC 14/09/2021
991/4875/21 HACC AC 14/09/2021
991/4875/21 HACC 13/09/2021
991/4875/21 HACC 13/09/2021
991/4875/21 HACC 23/07/2021 On the appointment of a preparatory court hearing
991/4589/21 HACC 15/07/2021
991/4589/21 HACC 15/07/2021
991/4562/21 HACC 08/07/2021
991/2655/21 HACC 29/06/2021
991/3986/21 HACC AC 18/06/2021
991/3908/21 HACC 15/06/2021
991/3908/21 HACC 15/06/2021
991/3197/21 HACC 14/05/2021
991/2654/21 HACC 23/04/2021
991/2654/21 HACC 23/04/2021
991/2655/21 HACC 21/04/2021
991/2655/21 HACC 21/04/2021
991/2655/21 HACC 20/04/2021
991/2077/21 HACC 12/04/2021
991/2171/21 HACC 07/04/2021
991/2171/21 HACC 07/04/2021
991/1533/21 HACC AC 31/03/2021
991/1290/21 HACC 22/03/2021 Decision on temporary access
991/1546/21 HACC 16/03/2021
991/1546/21 HACC 16/03/2021
991/1546/21 HACC 04/03/2021
991/1291/21 HACC 01/03/2021
991/1220/21 HACC 01/03/2021
991/1291/21 HACC 01/03/2021
991/1220/21 HACC 01/03/2021
991/718/21 HACC 16/02/2021 Decision on temporary access
991/718/21 HACC 16/02/2021 Decision on temporary access
991/486/21 HACC 02/02/2021
991/10564/20 HACC 13/01/2021
991/10564/20 HACC 13/01/2021
991/9840/20 HACC 09/12/2020
991/9840/20 HACC 09/12/2020
991/9476/20 HACC AC 03/12/2020
991/9838/20 HACC 02/12/2020
991/9302/20 HACC AC 01/12/2020
991/9680/20 HACC 27/11/2020
991/9680/20 HACC 27/11/2020
991/9584/20 HACC 25/11/2020
991/9584/20 HACC 25/11/2020
991/8678/20 HACC 11/11/2020
991/6115/20 HACC AC 04/11/2020
991/7252/20 HACC 30/10/2020
991/8869/20 HACC 28/10/2020
991/8412/20 HACC 20/10/2020
991/8412/20 HACC 20/10/2020
991/8562/20 HACC 16/10/2020
991/8408/20 HACC 12/10/2020
991/8298/20 HACC 08/10/2020
991/7827/20 HACC 25/09/2020 On changing the interim measure
991/7983/20 HACC 25/09/2020
991/7827/20 HACC 25/09/2020 On changing the interim measure
991/7827/20 HACC 23/09/2020
991/7893/20 HACC 23/09/2020
991/7893/20 HACC 23/09/2020
991/7805/20 HACC 21/09/2020
991/7805/20 HACC 21/09/2020 On changing the interim measure
991/7805/20 HACC 21/09/2020 On changing the interim measure
991/7252/20 HACC 14/09/2020 Decision on temporary access
991/7253/20 HACC 14/09/2020
991/6424/20 HACC 04/09/2020
991/6424/20 HACC 04/09/2020
991/6423/20 HACC 03/09/2020
991/6425/20 HACC 03/09/2020
991/6425/20 HACC 03/09/2020
991/6423/20 HACC 03/09/2020
991/6407/20 HACC AC 12/08/2020 On the imposition of an interim measure in the form of detention
991/6408/20 HACC 10/08/2020
991/6408/20 HACC 10/08/2020
991/6453/20 HACC 05/08/2020
991/6421/20 HACC 05/08/2020
991/6453/20 HACC 05/08/2020
991/6421/20 HACC 05/08/2020
991/5902/20 HACC 28/07/2020
991/5900/20 HACC 28/07/2020
991/5901/20 HACC 28/07/2020
991/5898/20 HACC 28/07/2020
991/5894/20 HACC 28/07/2020
991/5897/20 HACC 28/07/2020
991/5905/20 HACC 28/07/2020
991/5906/20 HACC 28/07/2020
991/5895/20 HACC 28/07/2020
991/5908/20 HACC 28/07/2020
991/5907/20 HACC 28/07/2020
991/5903/20 HACC 28/07/2020
991/5899/20 HACC 28/07/2020
991/5896/20 HACC 28/07/2020
991/5987/20 HACC 20/07/2020
991/5988/20 HACC 20/07/2020
991/5987/20 HACC 20/07/2020
991/5988/20 HACC 20/07/2020
991/5965/20 HACC 17/07/2020
991/5966/20 HACC 17/07/2020
991/5965/20 HACC 17/07/2020
991/5966/20 HACC 17/07/2020
991/5905/20 HACC 16/07/2020
991/5894/20 HACC 16/07/2020
991/5899/20 HACC 16/07/2020
991/5901/20 HACC 16/07/2020
991/5902/20 HACC 16/07/2020
991/5897/20 HACC 16/07/2020
991/5903/20 HACC 16/07/2020
991/5895/20 HACC 16/07/2020
991/5900/20 HACC 16/07/2020
991/5898/20 HACC 16/07/2020
991/5908/20 HACC 16/07/2020
991/5906/20 HACC 16/07/2020
991/5896/20 HACC 16/07/2020
991/5907/20 HACC 16/07/2020
991/4721/20 HACC 09/07/2020
991/4716/20 HACC 09/07/2020
991/4722/20 HACC 09/07/2020
991/5543/20 HACC 09/07/2020
991/5545/20 HACC 09/07/2020
991/5184/20 HACC 09/07/2020
991/5543/20 HACC 09/07/2020
991/5545/20 HACC 09/07/2020
991/5478/20 HACC 06/07/2020
991/5479/20 HACC 06/07/2020
991/5543/20 HACC 06/07/2020
991/5545/20 HACC 06/07/2020
991/5479/20 HACC 06/07/2020
991/5478/20 HACC 06/07/2020
991/5188/20 HACC 30/06/2020
991/5184/20 HACC 30/06/2020
991/5188/20 HACC 30/06/2020
991/3200/20 HACC 17/06/2020
991/3200/20 HACC 17/06/2020
991/4716/20 HACC 11/06/2020
991/4722/20 HACC 11/06/2020
991/4721/20 HACC 11/06/2020
991/4397/20 HACC 09/06/2020 Decision on temporary access
991/4398/20 HACC 09/06/2020
991/4399/20 HACC 05/06/2020
991/4419/20 HACC 03/06/2020
991/4018/20 HACC 01/06/2020
991/4019/20 HACC 01/06/2020
991/4020/20 HACC 01/06/2020
991/4018/20 HACC 01/06/2020
991/4019/20 HACC 01/06/2020
991/4020/20 HACC 01/06/2020
991/3455/20 HACC 08/05/2020
991/3455/20 HACC 08/05/2020
991/3454/20 HACC 08/05/2020
991/3454/20 HACC 08/05/2020
991/1922/20 HACC 07/05/2020
991/3457/20 HACC 07/05/2020
991/3456/20 HACC 07/05/2020
991/1922/20 HACC 07/05/2020
991/3341/20 HACC 07/05/2020
991/3340/20 HACC 07/05/2020
991/3459/20 HACC 06/05/2020
991/3525/20 HACC 06/05/2020
991/3459/20 HACC 06/05/2020
991/3458/20 HACC 06/05/2020
991/3273/20 HACC 06/05/2020
991/3273/20 HACC 06/05/2020
991/3457/20 HACC 06/05/2020
991/3456/20 HACC 06/05/2020
991/3269/20 HACC 05/05/2020
991/3272/20 HACC 05/05/2020
991/3271/20 HACC 05/05/2020
991/3458/20 HACC 05/05/2020
991/3268/20 HACC 04/05/2020
991/3200/20 HACC 04/05/2020
991/3270/20 HACC 04/05/2020
991/3268/20 HACC 04/05/2020
991/3270/20 HACC 04/05/2020
991/3272/20 HACC 04/05/2020
991/3271/20 HACC 04/05/2020
991/3148/20 HACC 04/05/2020
991/3146/20 HACC 30/04/2020
991/3179/20 HACC 30/04/2020
991/3179/20 HACC 30/04/2020
991/3146/20 HACC 30/04/2020
991/3138/20 HACC 29/04/2020
991/2040/20 HACC 29/04/2020
991/3138/20 HACC 29/04/2020
991/3175/20 HACC 29/04/2020
991/3147/20 HACC 29/04/2020
991/3175/20 HACC 29/04/2020
991/3176/20 HACC 28/04/2020
991/3177/20 HACC 28/04/2020
991/3149/20 HACC 27/04/2020
991/3149/20 HACC 27/04/2020
991/3177/20 HACC 27/04/2020
991/3176/20 HACC 27/04/2020
991/3269/20 HACC 27/04/2020
991/3123/20 HACC 24/04/2020
991/3122/20 HACC 24/04/2020
991/3124/20 HACC 24/04/2020
991/3203/20 HACC 23/04/2020
991/3203/20 HACC 23/04/2020 On the extension of the period of pre-trial investigation of criminal proceedings
991/3148/20 HACC 23/04/2020
991/3147/20 HACC 23/04/2020
991/3203/20 HACC 23/04/2020 On the extension of the period of pre-trial investigation of criminal proceedings
991/2598/20 HACC 06/04/2020
991/1551/20 HACC AC 06/04/2020
991/1551/20 HACC AC 06/04/2020
991/2040/20 HACC 12/03/2020
991/2040/20 HACC 10/03/2020
991/1551/20 HACC 25/02/2020 On the extension of the period of pre-trial investigation of criminal proceedings
991/1551/20 HACC 25/02/2020 On the extension of the period of pre-trial investigation of criminal proceedings